js/src/jit-test/tests/parser/bug-888002-3.js

Sat, 03 Jan 2015 20:18:00 +0100

author
Michael Schloh von Bennewitz <michael@schloh.com>
date
Sat, 03 Jan 2015 20:18:00 +0100
branch
TOR_BUG_3246
changeset 7
129ffea94266
permissions
-rw-r--r--

Conditionally enable double key logic according to:
private browsing mode or privacy.thirdparty.isolate preference and
implement in GetCookieStringCommon and FindCookie where it counts...
With some reservations of how to convince FindCookie users to test
condition and pass a nullptr when disabling double key logic.

michael@0 1 // Constant folding doesn't affect strict delete either.
michael@0 2 // In particular, it doesn't affect whether |delete x| is a strict error.
michael@0 3
michael@0 4 load(libdir + "asserts.js");
michael@0 5
michael@0 6 (function (x) {
michael@0 7 "use strict";
michael@0 8
michael@0 9 // These senseless delete-expressions are legal even in strict mode.
michael@0 10 // Per ES5.1 11.4.1 step 2, each one does nothing and returns true.
michael@0 11 assertEq(delete (1 ? x : x), true);
michael@0 12 assertEq(delete (0 || x), true);
michael@0 13 assertEq(delete (1 && x), true);
michael@0 14
michael@0 15 // Plain `delete x` is a SyntaxError though.
michael@0 16 assertThrowsInstanceOf(() => eval('delete x'), SyntaxError);
michael@0 17 assertThrowsInstanceOf(() => Function('"use strict"; delete x'), SyntaxError);
michael@0 18 }());

mercurial