The Tor Browser: js/src/tests/ecma_3/RegExp/regress-188206.js@129ffea94266 (annotated)

js/src/tests/ecma_3/RegExp/regress-188206.js@129ffea94266 (annotated)

js/src/tests/ecma_3/RegExp/regress-188206.js

Sat, 03 Jan 2015 20:18:00 +0100

author: Michael Schloh von Bennewitz <michael@schloh.com>
date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 20:18:00 +0100
branch: TOR_BUG_3246
changeset 7: 129ffea94266
permissions: -rw-r--r--

Conditionally enable double key logic according to:
private browsing mode or privacy.thirdparty.isolate preference and
implement in GetCookieStringCommon and FindCookie where it counts...
With some reservations of how to convince FindCookie users to test
condition and pass a nullptr when disabling double key logic.

 /* -*- Mode: C++; tab-width: 2; indent-tabs-mode: nil; c-basic-offset: 2 -*- */
 /* This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
  * License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this
  * file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/. */
 /*
  *
  * Date:    21 January 2003
  * SUMMARY: Invalid use of regexp quantifiers should generate SyntaxErrors
  *
  * See http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=188206
  * and http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85721#c48 etc.
  * and http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=190685
  * and http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197451
  */
 //-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 var UBound = 0;
 var BUGNUMBER = 188206;
 var summary = 'Invalid use of regexp quantifiers should generate SyntaxErrors';
 var TEST_PASSED = 'SyntaxError';
 var TEST_FAILED = 'Generated an error, but NOT a SyntaxError!';
 var TEST_FAILED_BADLY = 'Did not generate ANY error!!!';
 var CHECK_PASSED = 'Should not generate an error';
 var CHECK_FAILED = 'Generated an error!';
 var status = '';
 var statusitems = [];
 var actual = '';
 var actualvalues = [];
 var expect= '';
 var expectedvalues = [];
 /*
  * All the following are invalid uses of regexp quantifiers and
  * should generate SyntaxErrors. That's what we're testing for.
  *
  * To allow the test to compile and run, we have to hide the errors
  * inside eval strings, and check they are caught at run-time -
  *
  */
 status = inSection(1);
 testThis(' /a**/ ');
 status = inSection(2);
 testThis(' /a***/ ');
 status = inSection(3);
 testThis(' /a++/ ');
 status = inSection(4);
 testThis(' /a+++/ ');
 /*
  * The ? quantifier, unlike * or +, may appear twice in succession.
  * Thus we need at least three in a row to provoke a SyntaxError -
  */
 status = inSection(5);
 testThis(' /a???/ ');
 status = inSection(6);
 testThis(' /a????/ ');
 /*
  * Now do some weird things on the left side of the regexps -
  */
 status = inSection(9);
 testThis(' /+a/ ');
 status = inSection(10);
 testThis(' /++a/ ');
 status = inSection(11);
 testThis(' /?a/ ');
 status = inSection(12);
 testThis(' /??a/ ');
 /*
  * Misusing the {DecmalDigits} quantifier - according to BOTH ECMA and Perl.
  *
  * Just as with the * and + quantifiers above, can't have two {DecmalDigits}
  * quantifiers in succession - it's a SyntaxError.
  */
 status = inSection(28);
 testThis(' /x{1}{1}/ ');
 status = inSection(29);
 testThis(' /x{1,}{1}/ ');
 status = inSection(30);
 testThis(' /x{1,2}{1}/ ');
 status = inSection(31);
 testThis(' /x{1}{1,}/ ');
 status = inSection(32);
 testThis(' /x{1,}{1,}/ ');
 status = inSection(33);
 testThis(' /x{1,2}{1,}/ ');
 status = inSection(34);
 testThis(' /x{1}{1,2}/ ');
 status = inSection(35);
 testThis(' /x{1,}{1,2}/ ');
 status = inSection(36);
 testThis(' /x{1,2}{1,2}/ ');
 //-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 test();
 //-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 /*
  * Invalid syntax should generate a SyntaxError
  */
 function testThis(sInvalidSyntax)
 {
   expect = TEST_PASSED;
   actual = TEST_FAILED_BADLY;
   try
   {
     eval(sInvalidSyntax);
   }
   catch(e)
   {
     if (e instanceof SyntaxError)
       actual = TEST_PASSED;
     else
       actual = TEST_FAILED;
   }
   statusitems[UBound] = status;
   expectedvalues[UBound] = expect;
   actualvalues[UBound] = actual;
   UBound++;
 }
 /*
  * Allowed syntax shouldn't generate any errors
  */
 function checkThis(sAllowedSyntax)
 {
   expect = CHECK_PASSED;
   actual = CHECK_PASSED;
   try
   {
     eval(sAllowedSyntax);
   }
   catch(e)
   {
     actual = CHECK_FAILED;
   }
   statusitems[UBound] = status;
   expectedvalues[UBound] = expect;
   actualvalues[UBound] = actual;
   UBound++;
 }
 function test()
 {
   enterFunc('test');
   printBugNumber(BUGNUMBER);
   printStatus(summary);
   for (var i=0; i<UBound; i++)
   {
     reportCompare(expectedvalues[i], actualvalues[i], statusitems[i]);
   }
   exitFunc ('test');
 }