The Tor Browser: comparison media/webrtc/trunk/testing/gtest/test/gtest_output_test

--1:000000000000
+:49b622b1d7af
+// Copyright 2005, Google Inc.
+// All rights reserved.
+//
+// Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
+// modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
+// met:
+//
+//     * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
+// notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
+//     * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above
+// copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer
+// in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
+// distribution.
+//     * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its
+// contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from
+// this software without specific prior written permission.
+//
+// THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
+// "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
+// A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
+// OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
+// SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
+// LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
+// DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
+// THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
+// (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
+// OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
+//
+// The purpose of this file is to generate Google Test output under
+// various conditions.  The output will then be verified by
+// gtest_output_test.py to ensure that Google Test generates the
+// desired messages.  Therefore, most tests in this file are MEANT TO
+// FAIL.
+//
+// Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan)
+#include "gtest/gtest-spi.h"
+#include "gtest/gtest.h"
+// Indicates that this translation unit is part of Google Test's
+// implementation.  It must come before gtest-internal-inl.h is
+// included, or there will be a compiler error.  This trick is to
+// prevent a user from accidentally including gtest-internal-inl.h in
+// his code.
+#define GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ 1
+#include "src/gtest-internal-inl.h"
+#undef GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
+using testing::ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter;
+using testing::TestPartResultArray;
+using testing::internal::Notification;
+using testing::internal::ThreadWithParam;
+#endif
+namespace posix = ::testing::internal::posix;
+using testing::internal::String;
+using testing::internal::scoped_ptr;
+// Tests catching fatal failures.
+// A subroutine used by the following test.
+void TestEq1(int x) {
+ASSERT_EQ(1, x);
+}
+// This function calls a test subroutine, catches the fatal failure it
+// generates, and then returns early.
+void TryTestSubroutine() {
+// Calls a subrountine that yields a fatal failure.
+TestEq1(2);
+// Catches the fatal failure and aborts the test.
+//
+// The testing::Test:: prefix is necessary when calling
+// HasFatalFailure() outside of a TEST, TEST_F, or test fixture.
+if (testing::Test::HasFatalFailure()) return;
+// If we get here, something is wrong.
+FAIL() << "This should never be reached.";
+}
+TEST(PassingTest, PassingTest1) {
+}
+TEST(PassingTest, PassingTest2) {
+}
+// Tests that parameters of failing parameterized tests are printed in the
+// failing test summary.
+class FailingParamTest : public testing::TestWithParam<int> {};
+TEST_P(FailingParamTest, Fails) {
+EXPECT_EQ(1, GetParam());
+}
+// This generates a test which will fail. Google Test is expected to print
+// its parameter when it outputs the list of all failed tests.
+INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(PrintingFailingParams,
+FailingParamTest,
+testing::Values(2));
+static const char kGoldenString[] = "\"Line\0 1\"\nLine 2";
+TEST(NonfatalFailureTest, EscapesStringOperands) {
+std::string actual = "actual \"string\"";
+EXPECT_EQ(kGoldenString, actual);
+const char* golden = kGoldenString;
+EXPECT_EQ(golden, actual);
+}
+// Tests catching a fatal failure in a subroutine.
+TEST(FatalFailureTest, FatalFailureInSubroutine) {
+printf("(expecting a failure that x should be 1)\n");
+TryTestSubroutine();
+}
+// Tests catching a fatal failure in a nested subroutine.
+TEST(FatalFailureTest, FatalFailureInNestedSubroutine) {
+printf("(expecting a failure that x should be 1)\n");
+// Calls a subrountine that yields a fatal failure.
+TryTestSubroutine();
+// Catches the fatal failure and aborts the test.
+//
+// When calling HasFatalFailure() inside a TEST, TEST_F, or test
+// fixture, the testing::Test:: prefix is not needed.
+if (HasFatalFailure()) return;
+// If we get here, something is wrong.
+FAIL() << "This should never be reached.";
+}
+// Tests HasFatalFailure() after a failed EXPECT check.
+TEST(FatalFailureTest, NonfatalFailureInSubroutine) {
+printf("(expecting a failure on false)\n");
+EXPECT_TRUE(false);  // Generates a nonfatal failure
+ASSERT_FALSE(HasFatalFailure());  // This should succeed.
+}
+// Tests interleaving user logging and Google Test assertions.
+TEST(LoggingTest, InterleavingLoggingAndAssertions) {
+static const int a[4] = {
+3, 9, 2, 6
+};
+printf("(expecting 2 failures on (3) >= (a[i]))\n");
+for (int i = 0; i < static_cast<int>(sizeof(a)/sizeof(*a)); i++) {
+printf("i == %d\n", i);
+EXPECT_GE(3, a[i]);
+}
+}
+// Tests the SCOPED_TRACE macro.
+// A helper function for testing SCOPED_TRACE.
+void SubWithoutTrace(int n) {
+EXPECT_EQ(1, n);
+ASSERT_EQ(2, n);
+}
+// Another helper function for testing SCOPED_TRACE.
+void SubWithTrace(int n) {
+SCOPED_TRACE(testing::Message() << "n = " << n);
+SubWithoutTrace(n);
+}
+// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE() obeys lexical scopes.
+TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, ObeysScopes) {
+printf("(expected to fail)\n");
+// There should be no trace before SCOPED_TRACE() is invoked.
+ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and shouldn't have a trace.";
+{
+SCOPED_TRACE("Expected trace");
+// After SCOPED_TRACE(), a failure in the current scope should contain
+// the trace.
+ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should have a trace.";
+}
+// Once the control leaves the scope of the SCOPED_TRACE(), there
+// should be no trace again.
+ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and shouldn't have a trace.";
+}
+// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE works inside a loop.
+TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksInLoop) {
+printf("(expected to fail)\n");
+for (int i = 1; i <= 2; i++) {
+SCOPED_TRACE(testing::Message() << "i = " << i);
+SubWithoutTrace(i);
+}
+}
+// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE works in a subroutine.
+TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksInSubroutine) {
+printf("(expected to fail)\n");
+SubWithTrace(1);
+SubWithTrace(2);
+}
+// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE can be nested.
+TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, CanBeNested) {
+printf("(expected to fail)\n");
+SCOPED_TRACE("");  // A trace without a message.
+SubWithTrace(2);
+}
+// Tests that multiple SCOPED_TRACEs can be used in the same scope.
+TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, CanBeRepeated) {
+printf("(expected to fail)\n");
+SCOPED_TRACE("A");
+ADD_FAILURE()
+<< "This failure is expected, and should contain trace point A.";
+SCOPED_TRACE("B");
+ADD_FAILURE()
+<< "This failure is expected, and should contain trace point A and B.";
+{
+SCOPED_TRACE("C");
+ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should "
+<< "contain trace point A, B, and C.";
+}
+SCOPED_TRACE("D");
+ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should "
+<< "contain trace point A, B, and D.";
+}
+#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
+// Tests that SCOPED_TRACE()s can be used concurrently from multiple
+// threads.  Namely, an assertion should be affected by
+// SCOPED_TRACE()s in its own thread only.
+// Here's the sequence of actions that happen in the test:
+//
+//   Thread A (main)                | Thread B (spawned)
+//   ===============================|================================
+//   spawns thread B                |
+//   -------------------------------+--------------------------------
+//   waits for n1                   | SCOPED_TRACE("Trace B");
+//                                  | generates failure #1
+//                                  | notifies n1
+//   -------------------------------+--------------------------------
+//   SCOPED_TRACE("Trace A");       | waits for n2
+//   generates failure #2           |
+//   notifies n2                    |
+//   -------------------------------|--------------------------------
+//   waits for n3                   | generates failure #3
+//                                  | trace B dies
+//                                  | generates failure #4
+//                                  | notifies n3
+//   -------------------------------|--------------------------------
+//   generates failure #5           | finishes
+//   trace A dies                   |
+//   generates failure #6           |
+//   -------------------------------|--------------------------------
+//   waits for thread B to finish   |
+struct CheckPoints {
+Notification n1;
+Notification n2;
+Notification n3;
+};
+static void ThreadWithScopedTrace(CheckPoints* check_points) {
+{
+SCOPED_TRACE("Trace B");
+ADD_FAILURE()
+<< "Expected failure #1 (in thread B, only trace B alive).";
+check_points->n1.Notify();
+check_points->n2.WaitForNotification();
+ADD_FAILURE()
+<< "Expected failure #3 (in thread B, trace A & B both alive).";
+}  // Trace B dies here.
+ADD_FAILURE()
+<< "Expected failure #4 (in thread B, only trace A alive).";
+check_points->n3.Notify();
+}
+TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksConcurrently) {
+printf("(expecting 6 failures)\n");
+CheckPoints check_points;
+ThreadWithParam<CheckPoints*> thread(&ThreadWithScopedTrace,
+&check_points,
+NULL);
+check_points.n1.WaitForNotification();
+{
+SCOPED_TRACE("Trace A");
+ADD_FAILURE()
+<< "Expected failure #2 (in thread A, trace A & B both alive).";
+check_points.n2.Notify();
+check_points.n3.WaitForNotification();
+ADD_FAILURE()
+<< "Expected failure #5 (in thread A, only trace A alive).";
+}  // Trace A dies here.
+ADD_FAILURE()
+<< "Expected failure #6 (in thread A, no trace alive).";
+thread.Join();
+}
+#endif  // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
+TEST(DisabledTestsWarningTest,
+DISABLED_AlsoRunDisabledTestsFlagSuppressesWarning) {
+// This test body is intentionally empty.  Its sole purpose is for
+// verifying that the --gtest_also_run_disabled_tests flag
+// suppresses the "YOU HAVE 12 DISABLED TESTS" warning at the end of
+// the test output.
+}
+// Tests using assertions outside of TEST and TEST_F.
+//
+// This function creates two failures intentionally.
+void AdHocTest() {
+printf("The non-test part of the code is expected to have 2 failures.\n\n");
+EXPECT_TRUE(false);
+EXPECT_EQ(2, 3);
+}
+// Runs all TESTs, all TEST_Fs, and the ad hoc test.
+int RunAllTests() {
+AdHocTest();
+return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
+}
+// Tests non-fatal failures in the fixture constructor.
+class NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest : public testing::Test {
+protected:
+NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() {
+printf("(expecting 5 failures)\n");
+ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #1, in the test fixture c'tor.";
+}
+~NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() {
+ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #5, in the test fixture d'tor.";
+}
+virtual void SetUp() {
+ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #2, in SetUp().";
+}
+virtual void TearDown() {
+ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #4, in TearDown.";
+}
+};
+TEST_F(NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest, FailureInConstructor) {
+ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #3, in the test body.";
+}
+// Tests fatal failures in the fixture constructor.
+class FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest : public testing::Test {
+protected:
+FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() {
+printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n");
+Init();
+}
+~FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() {
+ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #2, in the test fixture d'tor.";
+}
+virtual void SetUp() {
+ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in SetUp().  "
+<< "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor "
+<< "had a fatal failure.";
+}
+virtual void TearDown() {
+ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in TearDown().  "
+<< "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor "
+<< "had a fatal failure.";
+}
+private:
+void Init() {
+FAIL() << "Expected failure #1, in the test fixture c'tor.";
+}
+};
+TEST_F(FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest, FailureInConstructor) {
+ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in the test body.  "
+<< "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor "
+<< "had a fatal failure.";
+}
+// Tests non-fatal failures in SetUp().
+class NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest : public testing::Test {
+protected:
+virtual ~NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest() {
+Deinit();
+}
+virtual void SetUp() {
+printf("(expecting 4 failures)\n");
+ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #1, in SetUp().";
+}
+virtual void TearDown() {
+FAIL() << "Expected failure #3, in TearDown().";
+}
+private:
+void Deinit() {
+FAIL() << "Expected failure #4, in the test fixture d'tor.";
+}
+};
+TEST_F(NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest, FailureInSetUp) {
+FAIL() << "Expected failure #2, in the test function.";
+}
+// Tests fatal failures in SetUp().
+class FatalFailureInSetUpTest : public testing::Test {
+protected:
+virtual ~FatalFailureInSetUpTest() {
+Deinit();
+}
+virtual void SetUp() {
+printf("(expecting 3 failures)\n");
+FAIL() << "Expected failure #1, in SetUp().";
+}
+virtual void TearDown() {
+FAIL() << "Expected failure #2, in TearDown().";
+}
+private:
+void Deinit() {
+FAIL() << "Expected failure #3, in the test fixture d'tor.";
+}
+};
+TEST_F(FatalFailureInSetUpTest, FailureInSetUp) {
+FAIL() << "UNEXPECTED failure in the test function.  "
+<< "We should never get here, as SetUp() failed.";
+}
+TEST(AddFailureAtTest, MessageContainsSpecifiedFileAndLineNumber) {
+ADD_FAILURE_AT("foo.cc", 42) << "Expected failure in foo.cc";
+}
+#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
+// A unary function that may die.
+void DieIf(bool should_die) {
+GTEST_CHECK_(!should_die) << " - death inside DieIf().";
+}
+// Tests running death tests in a multi-threaded context.
+// Used for coordination between the main and the spawn thread.
+struct SpawnThreadNotifications {
+SpawnThreadNotifications() {}
+Notification spawn_thread_started;
+Notification spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate;
+private:
+GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(SpawnThreadNotifications);
+};
+// The function to be executed in the thread spawn by the
+// MultipleThreads test (below).
+static void ThreadRoutine(SpawnThreadNotifications* notifications) {
+// Signals the main thread that this thread has started.
+notifications->spawn_thread_started.Notify();
+// Waits for permission to finish from the main thread.
+notifications->spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate.WaitForNotification();
+}
+// This is a death-test test, but it's not named with a DeathTest
+// suffix.  It starts threads which might interfere with later
+// death tests, so it must run after all other death tests.
+class DeathTestAndMultiThreadsTest : public testing::Test {
+protected:
+// Starts a thread and waits for it to begin.
+virtual void SetUp() {
+thread_.reset(new ThreadWithParam<SpawnThreadNotifications*>(
+&ThreadRoutine, &notifications_, NULL));
+notifications_.spawn_thread_started.WaitForNotification();
+}
+// Tells the thread to finish, and reaps it.
+// Depending on the version of the thread library in use,
+// a manager thread might still be left running that will interfere
+// with later death tests.  This is unfortunate, but this class
+// cleans up after itself as best it can.
+virtual void TearDown() {
+notifications_.spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate.Notify();
+}
+private:
+SpawnThreadNotifications notifications_;
+scoped_ptr<ThreadWithParam<SpawnThreadNotifications*> > thread_;
+};
+#endif  // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
+// The MixedUpTestCaseTest test case verifies that Google Test will fail a
+// test if it uses a different fixture class than what other tests in
+// the same test case use.  It deliberately contains two fixture
+// classes with the same name but defined in different namespaces.
+// The MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest test case verifies that
+// when the user defines two tests with the same test case name AND
+// same test name (but in different namespaces), the second test will
+// fail.
+namespace foo {
+class MixedUpTestCaseTest : public testing::Test {
+};
+TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, FirstTestFromNamespaceFoo) {}
+TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, SecondTestFromNamespaceFoo) {}
+class MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest : public testing::Test {
+};
+TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest,
+TheSecondTestWithThisNameShouldFail) {}
+}  // namespace foo
+namespace bar {
+class MixedUpTestCaseTest : public testing::Test {
+};
+// The following two tests are expected to fail.  We rely on the
+// golden file to check that Google Test generates the right error message.
+TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, ThisShouldFail) {}
+TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, ThisShouldFailToo) {}
+class MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest : public testing::Test {
+};
+// Expected to fail.  We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test
+// generates the right error message.
+TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest,
+TheSecondTestWithThisNameShouldFail) {}
+}  // namespace bar
+// The following two test cases verify that Google Test catches the user
+// error of mixing TEST and TEST_F in the same test case.  The first
+// test case checks the scenario where TEST_F appears before TEST, and
+// the second one checks where TEST appears before TEST_F.
+class TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case : public testing::Test {
+};
+TEST_F(TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST_F) {}
+// Expected to fail.  We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test
+// generates the right error message.
+TEST(TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTESTAndShouldFail) {}
+class TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case : public testing::Test {
+};
+TEST(TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST) {}
+// Expected to fail.  We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test
+// generates the right error message.
+TEST_F(TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST_FAndShouldFail) {
+}
+// Used for testing EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() and EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE().
+int global_integer = 0;
+// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() can reference global variables.
+TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, CanReferenceGlobalVariables) {
+global_integer = 0;
+EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
+EXPECT_EQ(1, global_integer) << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
+}, "Expected non-fatal failure.");
+}
+// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() can reference local variables
+// (static or not).
+TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, CanReferenceLocalVariables) {
+int m = 0;
+static int n;
+n = 1;
+EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
+EXPECT_EQ(m, n) << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
+}, "Expected non-fatal failure.");
+}
+// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() succeeds when there is exactly
+// one non-fatal failure and no fatal failure.
+TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, SucceedsWhenThereIsOneNonfatalFailure) {
+EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
+ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
+}, "Expected non-fatal failure.");
+}
+// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is no
+// non-fatal failure.
+TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsNoNonfatalFailure) {
+printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
+EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
+}, "");
+}
+// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there are two
+// non-fatal failures.
+TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereAreTwoNonfatalFailures) {
+printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
+EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
+ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure 1.";
+ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure 2.";
+}, "");
+}
+// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is one fatal
+// failure.
+TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsOneFatalFailure) {
+printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
+EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
+FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
+}, "");
+}
+// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being
+// tested returns.
+TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementReturns) {
+printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
+EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
+return;
+}, "");
+}
+#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
+// Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being
+// tested throws.
+TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementThrows) {
+printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
+try {
+EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({
+throw 0;
+}, "");
+} catch(int) {  // NOLINT
+}
+}
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
+// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() can reference global variables.
+TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, CanReferenceGlobalVariables) {
+global_integer = 0;
+EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
+ASSERT_EQ(1, global_integer) << "Expected fatal failure.";
+}, "Expected fatal failure.");
+}
+// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() can reference local static
+// variables.
+TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, CanReferenceLocalStaticVariables) {
+static int n;
+n = 1;
+EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
+ASSERT_EQ(0, n) << "Expected fatal failure.";
+}, "Expected fatal failure.");
+}
+// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() succeeds when there is exactly
+// one fatal failure and no non-fatal failure.
+TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, SucceedsWhenThereIsOneFatalFailure) {
+EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
+FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
+}, "Expected fatal failure.");
+}
+// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is no fatal
+// failure.
+TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsNoFatalFailure) {
+printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
+EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
+}, "");
+}
+// A helper for generating a fatal failure.
+void FatalFailure() {
+FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
+}
+// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there are two
+// fatal failures.
+TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereAreTwoFatalFailures) {
+printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
+EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
+FatalFailure();
+FatalFailure();
+}, "");
+}
+// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is one non-fatal
+// failure.
+TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsOneNonfatalFailure) {
+printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
+EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
+ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
+}, "");
+}
+// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being
+// tested returns.
+TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementReturns) {
+printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
+EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
+return;
+}, "");
+}
+#if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
+// Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being
+// tested throws.
+TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementThrows) {
+printf("(expecting a failure)\n");
+try {
+EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({
+throw 0;
+}, "");
+} catch(int) {  // NOLINT
+}
+}
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS
+// This #ifdef block tests the output of typed tests.
+#if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST
+template <typename T>
+class TypedTest : public testing::Test {
+};
+TYPED_TEST_CASE(TypedTest, testing::Types<int>);
+TYPED_TEST(TypedTest, Success) {
+EXPECT_EQ(0, TypeParam());
+}
+TYPED_TEST(TypedTest, Failure) {
+EXPECT_EQ(1, TypeParam()) << "Expected failure";
+}
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST
+// This #ifdef block tests the output of type-parameterized tests.
+#if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P
+template <typename T>
+class TypedTestP : public testing::Test {
+};
+TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(TypedTestP);
+TYPED_TEST_P(TypedTestP, Success) {
+EXPECT_EQ(0U, TypeParam());
+}
+TYPED_TEST_P(TypedTestP, Failure) {
+EXPECT_EQ(1U, TypeParam()) << "Expected failure";
+}
+REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(TypedTestP, Success, Failure);
+typedef testing::Types<unsigned char, unsigned int> UnsignedTypes;
+INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(Unsigned, TypedTestP, UnsignedTypes);
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P
+#if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+// We rely on the golden file to verify that tests whose test case
+// name ends with DeathTest are run first.
+TEST(ADeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) {
+}
+# if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST
+// We rely on the golden file to verify that typed tests whose test
+// case name ends with DeathTest are run first.
+template <typename T>
+class ATypedDeathTest : public testing::Test {
+};
+typedef testing::Types<int, double> NumericTypes;
+TYPED_TEST_CASE(ATypedDeathTest, NumericTypes);
+TYPED_TEST(ATypedDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) {
+}
+# endif  // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST
+# if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P
+// We rely on the golden file to verify that type-parameterized tests
+// whose test case name ends with DeathTest are run first.
+template <typename T>
+class ATypeParamDeathTest : public testing::Test {
+};
+TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(ATypeParamDeathTest);
+TYPED_TEST_P(ATypeParamDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) {
+}
+REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(ATypeParamDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst);
+INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(My, ATypeParamDeathTest, NumericTypes);
+# endif  // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+// Tests various failure conditions of
+// EXPECT_{,NON}FATAL_FAILURE{,_ON_ALL_THREADS}.
+class ExpectFailureTest : public testing::Test {
+public:  // Must be public and not protected due to a bug in g++ 3.4.2.
+enum FailureMode {
+FATAL_FAILURE,
+NONFATAL_FAILURE
+};
+static void AddFailure(FailureMode failure) {
+if (failure == FATAL_FAILURE) {
+FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
+} else {
+ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
+}
+}
+};
+TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectFatalFailure) {
+// Expected fatal failure, but succeeds.
+printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
+EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(SUCCEED(), "Expected fatal failure.");
+// Expected fatal failure, but got a non-fatal failure.
+printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
+EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), "Expected non-fatal "
+"failure.");
+// Wrong message.
+printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
+EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), "Some other fatal failure "
+"expected.");
+}
+TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectNonFatalFailure) {
+// Expected non-fatal failure, but succeeds.
+printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
+EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(SUCCEED(), "Expected non-fatal failure.");
+// Expected non-fatal failure, but got a fatal failure.
+printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
+EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), "Expected fatal failure.");
+// Wrong message.
+printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
+EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), "Some other non-fatal "
+"failure.");
+}
+#if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
+class ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest : public ExpectFailureTest {
+protected:
+static void AddFailureInOtherThread(FailureMode failure) {
+ThreadWithParam<FailureMode> thread(&AddFailure, failure, NULL);
+thread.Join();
+}
+};
+TEST_F(ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest, ExpectFatalFailure) {
+// We only intercept the current thread.
+printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n");
+EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailureInOtherThread(FATAL_FAILURE),
+"Expected fatal failure.");
+}
+TEST_F(ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest, ExpectNonFatalFailure) {
+// We only intercept the current thread.
+printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n");
+EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailureInOtherThread(NONFATAL_FAILURE),
+"Expected non-fatal failure.");
+}
+typedef ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterTest;
+// Tests that the ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter only catches failures from
+// the current thread if it is instantiated with INTERCEPT_ONLY_CURRENT_THREAD.
+TEST_F(ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterTest, InterceptOnlyCurrentThread) {
+printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n");
+TestPartResultArray results;
+{
+ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter reporter(
+ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter::INTERCEPT_ONLY_CURRENT_THREAD,
+&results);
+AddFailureInOtherThread(FATAL_FAILURE);
+AddFailureInOtherThread(NONFATAL_FAILURE);
+}
+// The two failures should not have been intercepted.
+EXPECT_EQ(0, results.size()) << "This shouldn't fail.";
+}
+#endif  // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE
+TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectFatalFailureOnAllThreads) {
+// Expected fatal failure, but succeeds.
+printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
+EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(SUCCEED(), "Expected fatal failure.");
+// Expected fatal failure, but got a non-fatal failure.
+printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
+EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE),
+"Expected non-fatal failure.");
+// Wrong message.
+printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
+EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE),
+"Some other fatal failure expected.");
+}
+TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectNonFatalFailureOnAllThreads) {
+// Expected non-fatal failure, but succeeds.
+printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
+EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(SUCCEED(), "Expected non-fatal "
+"failure.");
+// Expected non-fatal failure, but got a fatal failure.
+printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
+EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE),
+"Expected fatal failure.");
+// Wrong message.
+printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n");
+EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE),
+"Some other non-fatal failure.");
+}
+// Two test environments for testing testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment().
+class FooEnvironment : public testing::Environment {
+public:
+virtual void SetUp() {
+printf("%s", "FooEnvironment::SetUp() called.\n");
+}
+virtual void TearDown() {
+printf("%s", "FooEnvironment::TearDown() called.\n");
+FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure.";
+}
+};
+class BarEnvironment : public testing::Environment {
+public:
+virtual void SetUp() {
+printf("%s", "BarEnvironment::SetUp() called.\n");
+}
+virtual void TearDown() {
+printf("%s", "BarEnvironment::TearDown() called.\n");
+ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure.";
+}
+};
+bool GTEST_FLAG(internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests) = false;
+// The main function.
+//
+// The idea is to use Google Test to run all the tests we have defined (some
+// of them are intended to fail), and then compare the test results
+// with the "golden" file.
+int main(int argc, char **argv) {
+testing::GTEST_FLAG(print_time) = false;
+// We just run the tests, knowing some of them are intended to fail.
+// We will use a separate Python script to compare the output of
+// this program with the golden file.
+// It's hard to test InitGoogleTest() directly, as it has many
+// global side effects.  The following line serves as a sanity test
+// for it.
+testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv);
+if (argc >= 2 &&
+String(argv[1]) == "--gtest_internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests")
+GTEST_FLAG(internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests) = true;
+#if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+if (testing::internal::GTEST_FLAG(internal_run_death_test) != "") {
+// Skip the usual output capturing if we're running as the child
+// process of an threadsafe-style death test.
+# if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+posix::FReopen("nul:", "w", stdout);
+# else
+posix::FReopen("/dev/null", "w", stdout);
+# endif  // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS
+return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
+}
+#endif  // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST
+if (GTEST_FLAG(internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests))
+return RUN_ALL_TESTS();
+// Registers two global test environments.
+// The golden file verifies that they are set up in the order they
+// are registered, and torn down in the reverse order.
+testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new FooEnvironment);
+testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new BarEnvironment);
+return RunAllTests();
+}

The Tor Browser / file comparison

comparison: media/webrtc/trunk/testing/gtest/test/gtest_output_test_.cc

media/webrtc/trunk/testing/gtest/test/gtest_output_test_.cc