1.1 --- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
1.2 +++ b/layout/reftests/w3c-css/submitted/flexbox/flexbox-table-fixup-1b.xhtml Wed Dec 31 06:09:35 2014 +0100
1.3 @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
1.4 +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
1.5 +<!--
1.6 + Any copyright is dedicated to the Public Domain.
1.7 + http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
1.8 +-->
1.9 +<!--
1.10 + Testcase with table parts inside of a flex container, triggering
1.11 + table-fixup. We use justify-content:space-between to stick packing
1.12 + space between flex items, so that we can verify that e.g. a contiguous
1.13 + run of <td>s will end up in the same flex item (wrapped in a table).
1.14 +
1.15 + In this variant of the test, we also assign 'flex' values to the
1.16 + table parts - these values should have no effect, since these children
1.17 + don't themselves form flex items. The flex property _is_ honored on
1.18 + the <div class="c">, though, because _its_ box _is_ a direct child of a
1.19 + flexbox, so it _is_ a flex item.
1.20 +-->
1.21 +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
1.22 + <head>
1.23 + <title>CSS Test: Testing that the 'flex' shorthand has no effect on table cells in a flex container, since they aren't flex items</title>
1.24 + <link rel="author" title="Daniel Holbert" href="mailto:dholbert@mozilla.com"/>
1.25 + <link rel="help" href="http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-flexbox/#flex-items"/>
1.26 + <link rel="match" href="flexbox-table-fixup-1-ref.xhtml"/>
1.27 + <style>
1.28 + div.flexbox {
1.29 + border: 1px dashed blue;
1.30 + width: 200px;
1.31 + display: flex;
1.32 + justify-content: space-around;
1.33 + }
1.34 +
1.35 + <!-- NOTE: table-fixup pads each td element by 1px on each side. We
1.36 + override that for top & bottom, for simplicity. So the td makes us
1.37 + generate a box that's 2px wider than its contents. -->
1.38 + td {
1.39 + padding-top: 0px;
1.40 + padding-bottom: 0px;
1.41 + }
1.42 +
1.43 + .a {
1.44 + background: lightgreen;
1.45 + width: 48px;
1.46 + flex: 5 3 100px;
1.47 + }
1.48 +
1.49 + .b {
1.50 + background: yellow;
1.51 + width: 48px;
1.52 + flex: 1 2 3px;
1.53 + }
1.54 +
1.55 + .c {
1.56 + background: pink;
1.57 + flex: 0 0 48px;
1.58 + }
1.59 + </style>
1.60 + </head>
1.61 + <body>
1.62 + <!-- Just 2 adjacent table cells (they end up in the same table) -->
1.63 + <div class="flexbox"
1.64 + ><td class="a">cell1</td><td class="b">cell2</td></div>
1.65 +
1.66 + <!-- Table cell followed by tbody (they end up in the same table) -->
1.67 + <div class="flexbox"
1.68 + ><td class="a">cell1</td><tbody class="b">t</tbody></div>
1.69 +
1.70 + <!-- Empty table cell (ends up occupying 2px of width), followed by div,
1.71 + followed by nonempty table cell. (3 flex items). -->
1.72 + <!-- Note: We use "space-between" (instead of "space-around") here because
1.73 + it makes the math cleaner. (100px split 2 ways instead of 3 ways.) -->
1.74 + <div class="flexbox" style="justify-content: space-between"
1.75 + ><td></td><div class="c">div</div><td class="b">cell1</td></div>
1.76 + </body>
1.77 +</html>
