Sat, 03 Jan 2015 20:18:00 +0100
Conditionally enable double key logic according to:
private browsing mode or privacy.thirdparty.isolate preference and
implement in GetCookieStringCommon and FindCookie where it counts...
With some reservations of how to convince FindCookie users to test
condition and pass a nullptr when disabling double key logic.
1 /* -*- Mode: C++; tab-width: 2; indent-tabs-mode: nil; c-basic-offset: 2 -*- */
2 /* This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
3 * License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this
4 * file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/. */
7 /**
8 * File Name: RegExp/octal-003.js
9 * ECMA Section: 15.7.1
10 * Description: Based on ECMA 2 Draft 7 February 1999
11 * Simple test cases for matching OctalEscapeSequences.
12 * Author: christine@netscape.com
13 * Date: 19 February 1999
14 *
15 * Revised: 02 August 2002
16 * Author: pschwartau@netscape.com
17 *
18 * WHY: the original test expected the regexp /.\011/
19 * to match 'a' + String.fromCharCode(0) + '11'
20 *
21 * This is incorrect: the string is a 4-character string consisting of
22 * the characters <'a'>, <nul>, <'1'>, <'1'>. By contrast, the \011 in the
23 * regexp should be parsed as a single token: it is the octal escape sequence
24 * for the horizontal tab character '\t' === '\u0009' === '\x09' === '\011'.
25 *
26 * So the regexp consists of 2 characters: <any-character>, <'\t'>.
27 * There is no match between the regexp and the string.
28 *
29 * See the testcase ecma_3/RegExp/octal-002.js for an elaboration.
30 *
31 */
32 var SECTION = "RegExp/octal-003.js";
33 var VERSION = "ECMA_2";
34 var TITLE = "RegExp patterns that contain OctalEscapeSequences";
35 var BUGNUMBER="http://scopus/bugsplat/show_bug.cgi?id=346132";
37 startTest();
39 AddRegExpCases( /.\011/, "/\\011/", "a" + String.fromCharCode(0) + "11", "a\\011", 0, null );
41 test();
43 function AddRegExpCases(
44 regexp, str_regexp, pattern, str_pattern, index, matches_array ) {
46 // prevent a runtime error
48 if ( regexp.exec(pattern) == null || matches_array == null ) {
49 AddTestCase(
50 regexp + ".exec(" + str_pattern +")",
51 matches_array,
52 regexp.exec(pattern) );
54 return;
55 }
56 AddTestCase(
57 str_regexp + ".exec(" + str_pattern +").length",
58 matches_array.length,
59 regexp.exec(pattern).length );
61 AddTestCase(
62 str_regexp + ".exec(" + str_pattern +").index",
63 index,
64 regexp.exec(pattern).index );
66 AddTestCase(
67 str_regexp + ".exec(" + str_pattern +").input",
68 escape(pattern),
69 escape(regexp.exec(pattern).input) );
71 AddTestCase(
72 str_regexp + ".exec(" + str_pattern +").toString()",
73 matches_array.toString(),
74 escape(regexp.exec(pattern).toString()) );
76 var limit = matches_array.length > regexp.exec(pattern).length
77 ? matches_array.length
78 : regexp.exec(pattern).length;
80 for ( var matches = 0; matches < limit; matches++ ) {
81 AddTestCase(
82 str_regexp + ".exec(" + str_pattern +")[" + matches +"]",
83 matches_array[matches],
84 escape(regexp.exec(pattern)[matches]) );
85 }
87 }