diff -r 000000000000 -r 6474c204b198 toolkit/components/passwordmgr/InsecurePasswordUtils.jsm
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/toolkit/components/passwordmgr/InsecurePasswordUtils.jsm	Wed Dec 31 06:09:35 2014 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
+/* This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
+ * License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this
+ * file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/. */
+
+this.EXPORTED_SYMBOLS = [ "InsecurePasswordUtils" ];
+
+const Ci = Components.interfaces;
+const Cu = Components.utils;
+const Cc = Components.classes;
+
+Cu.import("resource://gre/modules/Services.jsm");
+Cu.import("resource://gre/modules/XPCOMUtils.jsm");
+
+XPCOMUtils.defineLazyModuleGetter(this, "devtools",
+                                  "resource://gre/modules/devtools/Loader.jsm");
+
+Object.defineProperty(this, "WebConsoleUtils", {
+  get: function() {
+    return devtools.require("devtools/toolkit/webconsole/utils").Utils;
+  },
+  configurable: true,
+  enumerable: true
+});
+
+const STRINGS_URI = "chrome://global/locale/security/security.properties";
+let l10n = new WebConsoleUtils.l10n(STRINGS_URI);
+
+this.InsecurePasswordUtils = {
+
+  _sendWebConsoleMessage : function (messageTag, domDoc) {
+    /*
+     * All web console messages are warnings for now so I decided to set the
+     * flag here and save a bit of the flag creation in the callers.
+     * It's easy to expose this later if needed
+     */
+
+    let  windowId = WebConsoleUtils.getInnerWindowId(domDoc.defaultView);
+    let category = "Insecure Password Field";
+    let flag = Ci.nsIScriptError.warningFlag;
+    let message = l10n.getStr(messageTag);
+    let consoleMsg = Cc["@mozilla.org/scripterror;1"]
+      .createInstance(Ci.nsIScriptError);
+
+    consoleMsg.initWithWindowID(
+      message, "", 0, 0, 0, flag, category, windowId);
+
+    Services.console.logMessage(consoleMsg);
+  },
+
+  /*
+   * Checks whether the passed uri is secure
+   * Check Protocol Flags to determine if scheme is secure:
+   * URI_DOES_NOT_RETURN_DATA - e.g.
+   *   "mailto"
+   * URI_IS_LOCAL_RESOURCE - e.g.
+   *   "data",
+   *   "resource",
+   *   "moz-icon"
+   * URI_INHERITS_SECURITY_CONTEXT - e.g.
+   *   "javascript"
+   * URI_SAFE_TO_LOAD_IN_SECURE_CONTEXT - e.g.
+   *   "https",
+   *   "moz-safe-about"
+   *
+   *   The use of this logic comes directly from nsMixedContentBlocker.cpp
+   *   At the time it was decided to include these protocols since a secure
+   *   uri for mixed content blocker means that the resource can't be
+   *   easily tampered with because 1) it is sent over an encrypted channel or
+   *   2) it is a local resource that never hits the network
+   *   or 3) it is a request sent without any response that could alter
+   *   the behavior of the page. It was decided to include the same logic
+   *   here both to be consistent with MCB and to make sure we cover all
+   *   "safe" protocols. Eventually, the code here and the code in MCB
+   *   will be moved to a common location that will be referenced from
+   *   both places. Look at
+   *   https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=899099 for more info.
+   */
+  _checkIfURIisSecure : function(uri) {
+    let isSafe = false;
+    let netutil = Cc["@mozilla.org/network/util;1"].getService(Ci.nsINetUtil);
+    let ph = Ci.nsIProtocolHandler;
+
+    if (netutil.URIChainHasFlags(uri, ph.URI_IS_LOCAL_RESOURCE) ||
+        netutil.URIChainHasFlags(uri, ph.URI_DOES_NOT_RETURN_DATA) ||
+        netutil.URIChainHasFlags(uri, ph.URI_INHERITS_SECURITY_CONTEXT) ||
+        netutil.URIChainHasFlags(uri, ph.URI_SAFE_TO_LOAD_IN_SECURE_CONTEXT)) {
+
+      isSafe = true;
+    }
+
+    return isSafe;
+  },
+
+  /*
+   * Checks whether the passed nested document is insecure
+   * or is inside an insecure parent document.
+   *
+   * We check the chain of frame ancestors all the way until the top document
+   * because MITM attackers could replace https:// iframes if they are nested inside
+   * http:// documents with their own content, thus creating a security risk
+   * and potentially stealing user data. Under such scenario, a user might not
+   * get a Mixed Content Blocker message, if the main document is served over HTTP
+   * and framing an HTTPS page as it would under the reverse scenario (http
+   * inside https).
+   */
+  _checkForInsecureNestedDocuments : function(domDoc) {
+    let uri = domDoc.documentURIObject;
+    if (domDoc.defaultView == domDoc.defaultView.parent) {
+      // We are at the top, nothing to check here
+      return false;
+    }
+    if (!this._checkIfURIisSecure(uri)) {
+      // We are insecure
+      return true;
+    }
+    // I am secure, but check my parent
+    return this._checkForInsecureNestedDocuments(domDoc.defaultView.parent.document);
+  },
+
+
+  /*
+   * Checks if there are insecure password fields present on the form's document
+   * i.e. passwords inside forms with http action, inside iframes with http src,
+   * or on insecure web pages. If insecure password fields are present,
+   * a log message is sent to the web console to warn developers.
+   */
+  checkForInsecurePasswords : function (aForm) {
+    var domDoc = aForm.ownerDocument;
+    let pageURI = domDoc.defaultView.top.document.documentURIObject;
+    let isSafePage = this._checkIfURIisSecure(pageURI);
+
+    if (!isSafePage) {
+      this._sendWebConsoleMessage("InsecurePasswordsPresentOnPage", domDoc);
+    }
+
+    // Check if we are on an iframe with insecure src, or inside another
+    // insecure iframe or document.
+    if (this._checkForInsecureNestedDocuments(domDoc)) {
+      this._sendWebConsoleMessage("InsecurePasswordsPresentOnIframe", domDoc);
+    }
+
+    if (aForm.action.match(/^http:\/\//)) {
+      this._sendWebConsoleMessage("InsecureFormActionPasswordsPresent", domDoc);
+    }
+  },
+};