Wed, 31 Dec 2014 06:09:35 +0100
Cloned upstream origin tor-browser at tor-browser-31.3.0esr-4.5-1-build1
revision ID fc1c9ff7c1b2defdbc039f12214767608f46423f for hacking purpose.
michael@0 | 1 | .. _build_overview: |
michael@0 | 2 | |
michael@0 | 3 | ===================== |
michael@0 | 4 | Build System Overview |
michael@0 | 5 | ===================== |
michael@0 | 6 | |
michael@0 | 7 | This document provides an overview on how the build system works. It is |
michael@0 | 8 | targeted at people wanting to learn about internals of the build system. |
michael@0 | 9 | It is not meant for persons who casually interact with the build system. |
michael@0 | 10 | That being said, knowledge empowers, so consider reading on. |
michael@0 | 11 | |
michael@0 | 12 | The build system is composed of many different components working in |
michael@0 | 13 | harmony to build the source tree. We begin with a graphic overview. |
michael@0 | 14 | |
michael@0 | 15 | .. graphviz:: |
michael@0 | 16 | |
michael@0 | 17 | digraph build_components { |
michael@0 | 18 | rankdir="LR"; |
michael@0 | 19 | "configure" -> "config.status" -> "build backend" -> "build output" |
michael@0 | 20 | } |
michael@0 | 21 | |
michael@0 | 22 | Phase 1: Configuration |
michael@0 | 23 | ====================== |
michael@0 | 24 | |
michael@0 | 25 | Phase 1 centers around the ``configure`` script, which is a bash shell script. |
michael@0 | 26 | The file is generated from a file called ``configure.in`` which is written in M4 |
michael@0 | 27 | and processed using Autoconf 2.13 to create the final configure script. |
michael@0 | 28 | You don't have to worry about how you obtain a ``configure`` file: the build |
michael@0 | 29 | system does this for you. |
michael@0 | 30 | |
michael@0 | 31 | The primary job of ``configure`` is to determine characteristics of the system |
michael@0 | 32 | and compiler, apply options passed into it, and validate everything looks OK to |
michael@0 | 33 | build. The primary output of the ``configure`` script is an executable file |
michael@0 | 34 | in the object directory called ``config.status``. ``configure`` also produces |
michael@0 | 35 | some additional files (like ``autoconf.mk``). However, the most important file |
michael@0 | 36 | in terms of architecture is ``config.status``. |
michael@0 | 37 | |
michael@0 | 38 | The existence of a ``config.status`` file may be familiar to those who have worked |
michael@0 | 39 | with Autoconf before. However, Mozilla's ``config.status`` is different from almost |
michael@0 | 40 | any other ``config.status`` you've ever seen: it's written in Python! Instead of |
michael@0 | 41 | having our ``configure`` script produce a shell script, we have it generating |
michael@0 | 42 | Python. |
michael@0 | 43 | |
michael@0 | 44 | Now is as good a time as any to mention that Python is prevalent in our build |
michael@0 | 45 | system. If we need to write code for the build system, we do it in Python. |
michael@0 | 46 | That's just how we roll. For more, see :ref:`python`. |
michael@0 | 47 | |
michael@0 | 48 | ``config.status`` contains 2 parts: data structures representing the output of |
michael@0 | 49 | ``configure`` and a command-line interface for preparing/configuring/generating |
michael@0 | 50 | an appropriate build backend. (A build backend is merely a tool used to build |
michael@0 | 51 | the tree - like GNU Make or Tup). These data structures essentially describe |
michael@0 | 52 | the current state of the system and what the existing build configuration looks |
michael@0 | 53 | like. For example, it defines which compiler to use, how to invoke it, which |
michael@0 | 54 | application features are enabled, etc. You are encouraged to open up |
michael@0 | 55 | ``config.status`` to have a look for yourself! |
michael@0 | 56 | |
michael@0 | 57 | Once we have emitted a ``config.status`` file, we pass into the realm of |
michael@0 | 58 | phase 2. |
michael@0 | 59 | |
michael@0 | 60 | Phase 2: Build Backend Preparation and the Build Definition |
michael@0 | 61 | =========================================================== |
michael@0 | 62 | |
michael@0 | 63 | Once ``configure`` has determined what the current build configuration is, |
michael@0 | 64 | we need to apply this to the source tree so we can actually build. |
michael@0 | 65 | |
michael@0 | 66 | What essentially happens is the automatically-produced ``config.status`` Python |
michael@0 | 67 | script is executed as soon as ``configure`` has generated it. ``config.status`` |
michael@0 | 68 | is charged with the task of tell a tool how to build the tree. To do this, |
michael@0 | 69 | ``config.status`` must first scan the build system definition. |
michael@0 | 70 | |
michael@0 | 71 | The build system definition consists of various ``moz.build`` files in the tree. |
michael@0 | 72 | There is roughly one ``moz.build`` file per directory or per set of related directories. |
michael@0 | 73 | Each ``moz.build`` files defines how its part of the build config works. For |
michael@0 | 74 | example it says *I want these C++ files compiled* or *look for additional |
michael@0 | 75 | information in these directories.* config.status starts with the ``moz.build`` |
michael@0 | 76 | file from the root directory and then descends into referenced ``moz.build`` |
michael@0 | 77 | files by following ``DIRS`` variables or similar. |
michael@0 | 78 | |
michael@0 | 79 | As the ``moz.build`` files are read, data structures describing the overall |
michael@0 | 80 | build system definition are emitted. These data structures are then fed into a |
michael@0 | 81 | build backend, which then performs actions, such as writing out files to |
michael@0 | 82 | be read by a build tool. e.g. a ``make`` backend will write a |
michael@0 | 83 | ``Makefile``. |
michael@0 | 84 | |
michael@0 | 85 | When ``config.status`` runs, you'll see the following output:: |
michael@0 | 86 | |
michael@0 | 87 | Reticulating splines... |
michael@0 | 88 | Finished reading 1096 moz.build files into 1276 descriptors in 2.40s |
michael@0 | 89 | Backend executed in 2.39s |
michael@0 | 90 | 2188 total backend files. 0 created; 1 updated; 2187 unchanged |
michael@0 | 91 | Total wall time: 5.03s; CPU time: 3.79s; Efficiency: 75% |
michael@0 | 92 | |
michael@0 | 93 | What this is saying is that a total of *1096* ``moz.build`` files were read. |
michael@0 | 94 | Altogether, *1276* data structures describing the build configuration were |
michael@0 | 95 | derived from them. It took *2.40s* wall time to just read these files and |
michael@0 | 96 | produce the data structures. The *1276* data structures were fed into the |
michael@0 | 97 | build backend which then determined it had to manage *2188* files derived |
michael@0 | 98 | from those data structures. Most of them already existed and didn't need |
michael@0 | 99 | changed. However, *1* was updated as a result of the new configuration. |
michael@0 | 100 | The whole process took *5.03s*. Although, only *3.79s* was in |
michael@0 | 101 | CPU time. That likely means we spent roughly *25%* of the time waiting on |
michael@0 | 102 | I/O. |
michael@0 | 103 | |
michael@0 | 104 | For more on how ``moz.build`` files work, see :ref:`mozbuild-files`. |
michael@0 | 105 | |
michael@0 | 106 | Phase 3: Invokation of the Build Backend |
michael@0 | 107 | ======================================== |
michael@0 | 108 | |
michael@0 | 109 | When most people think of the build system, they think of phase 3. This is |
michael@0 | 110 | where we take all the code in the tree and produce Firefox or whatever |
michael@0 | 111 | application you are creating. Phase 3 effectively takes whatever was |
michael@0 | 112 | generated by phase 2 and runs it. Since the dawn of Mozilla, this has been |
michael@0 | 113 | make consuming Makefiles. However, with the transition to moz.build files, |
michael@0 | 114 | you may soon see non-Make build backends, such as Tup or Visual Studio. |
michael@0 | 115 | |
michael@0 | 116 | When building the tree, most of the time is spent in phase 3. This is when |
michael@0 | 117 | header files are installed, C++ files are compiled, files are preprocessed, etc. |