Wed, 31 Dec 2014 06:09:35 +0100
Cloned upstream origin tor-browser at tor-browser-31.3.0esr-4.5-1-build1
revision ID fc1c9ff7c1b2defdbc039f12214767608f46423f for hacking purpose.
michael@0 | 1 | // Copyright 2005, Google Inc. |
michael@0 | 2 | // All rights reserved. |
michael@0 | 3 | // |
michael@0 | 4 | // Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without |
michael@0 | 5 | // modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are |
michael@0 | 6 | // met: |
michael@0 | 7 | // |
michael@0 | 8 | // * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright |
michael@0 | 9 | // notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer. |
michael@0 | 10 | // * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above |
michael@0 | 11 | // copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer |
michael@0 | 12 | // in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the |
michael@0 | 13 | // distribution. |
michael@0 | 14 | // * Neither the name of Google Inc. nor the names of its |
michael@0 | 15 | // contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from |
michael@0 | 16 | // this software without specific prior written permission. |
michael@0 | 17 | // |
michael@0 | 18 | // THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS |
michael@0 | 19 | // "AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT |
michael@0 | 20 | // LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR |
michael@0 | 21 | // A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT |
michael@0 | 22 | // OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, |
michael@0 | 23 | // SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT |
michael@0 | 24 | // LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, |
michael@0 | 25 | // DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY |
michael@0 | 26 | // THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT |
michael@0 | 27 | // (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE |
michael@0 | 28 | // OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. |
michael@0 | 29 | // |
michael@0 | 30 | // The purpose of this file is to generate Google Test output under |
michael@0 | 31 | // various conditions. The output will then be verified by |
michael@0 | 32 | // gtest_output_test.py to ensure that Google Test generates the |
michael@0 | 33 | // desired messages. Therefore, most tests in this file are MEANT TO |
michael@0 | 34 | // FAIL. |
michael@0 | 35 | // |
michael@0 | 36 | // Author: wan@google.com (Zhanyong Wan) |
michael@0 | 37 | |
michael@0 | 38 | #include "gtest/gtest-spi.h" |
michael@0 | 39 | #include "gtest/gtest.h" |
michael@0 | 40 | |
michael@0 | 41 | // Indicates that this translation unit is part of Google Test's |
michael@0 | 42 | // implementation. It must come before gtest-internal-inl.h is |
michael@0 | 43 | // included, or there will be a compiler error. This trick is to |
michael@0 | 44 | // prevent a user from accidentally including gtest-internal-inl.h in |
michael@0 | 45 | // his code. |
michael@0 | 46 | #define GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ 1 |
michael@0 | 47 | #include "src/gtest-internal-inl.h" |
michael@0 | 48 | #undef GTEST_IMPLEMENTATION_ |
michael@0 | 49 | |
michael@0 | 50 | #include <stdlib.h> |
michael@0 | 51 | |
michael@0 | 52 | #if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE |
michael@0 | 53 | using testing::ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter; |
michael@0 | 54 | using testing::TestPartResultArray; |
michael@0 | 55 | |
michael@0 | 56 | using testing::internal::Notification; |
michael@0 | 57 | using testing::internal::ThreadWithParam; |
michael@0 | 58 | #endif |
michael@0 | 59 | |
michael@0 | 60 | namespace posix = ::testing::internal::posix; |
michael@0 | 61 | using testing::internal::String; |
michael@0 | 62 | using testing::internal::scoped_ptr; |
michael@0 | 63 | |
michael@0 | 64 | // Tests catching fatal failures. |
michael@0 | 65 | |
michael@0 | 66 | // A subroutine used by the following test. |
michael@0 | 67 | void TestEq1(int x) { |
michael@0 | 68 | ASSERT_EQ(1, x); |
michael@0 | 69 | } |
michael@0 | 70 | |
michael@0 | 71 | // This function calls a test subroutine, catches the fatal failure it |
michael@0 | 72 | // generates, and then returns early. |
michael@0 | 73 | void TryTestSubroutine() { |
michael@0 | 74 | // Calls a subrountine that yields a fatal failure. |
michael@0 | 75 | TestEq1(2); |
michael@0 | 76 | |
michael@0 | 77 | // Catches the fatal failure and aborts the test. |
michael@0 | 78 | // |
michael@0 | 79 | // The testing::Test:: prefix is necessary when calling |
michael@0 | 80 | // HasFatalFailure() outside of a TEST, TEST_F, or test fixture. |
michael@0 | 81 | if (testing::Test::HasFatalFailure()) return; |
michael@0 | 82 | |
michael@0 | 83 | // If we get here, something is wrong. |
michael@0 | 84 | FAIL() << "This should never be reached."; |
michael@0 | 85 | } |
michael@0 | 86 | |
michael@0 | 87 | TEST(PassingTest, PassingTest1) { |
michael@0 | 88 | } |
michael@0 | 89 | |
michael@0 | 90 | TEST(PassingTest, PassingTest2) { |
michael@0 | 91 | } |
michael@0 | 92 | |
michael@0 | 93 | // Tests that parameters of failing parameterized tests are printed in the |
michael@0 | 94 | // failing test summary. |
michael@0 | 95 | class FailingParamTest : public testing::TestWithParam<int> {}; |
michael@0 | 96 | |
michael@0 | 97 | TEST_P(FailingParamTest, Fails) { |
michael@0 | 98 | EXPECT_EQ(1, GetParam()); |
michael@0 | 99 | } |
michael@0 | 100 | |
michael@0 | 101 | // This generates a test which will fail. Google Test is expected to print |
michael@0 | 102 | // its parameter when it outputs the list of all failed tests. |
michael@0 | 103 | INSTANTIATE_TEST_CASE_P(PrintingFailingParams, |
michael@0 | 104 | FailingParamTest, |
michael@0 | 105 | testing::Values(2)); |
michael@0 | 106 | |
michael@0 | 107 | static const char kGoldenString[] = "\"Line\0 1\"\nLine 2"; |
michael@0 | 108 | |
michael@0 | 109 | TEST(NonfatalFailureTest, EscapesStringOperands) { |
michael@0 | 110 | std::string actual = "actual \"string\""; |
michael@0 | 111 | EXPECT_EQ(kGoldenString, actual); |
michael@0 | 112 | |
michael@0 | 113 | const char* golden = kGoldenString; |
michael@0 | 114 | EXPECT_EQ(golden, actual); |
michael@0 | 115 | } |
michael@0 | 116 | |
michael@0 | 117 | // Tests catching a fatal failure in a subroutine. |
michael@0 | 118 | TEST(FatalFailureTest, FatalFailureInSubroutine) { |
michael@0 | 119 | printf("(expecting a failure that x should be 1)\n"); |
michael@0 | 120 | |
michael@0 | 121 | TryTestSubroutine(); |
michael@0 | 122 | } |
michael@0 | 123 | |
michael@0 | 124 | // Tests catching a fatal failure in a nested subroutine. |
michael@0 | 125 | TEST(FatalFailureTest, FatalFailureInNestedSubroutine) { |
michael@0 | 126 | printf("(expecting a failure that x should be 1)\n"); |
michael@0 | 127 | |
michael@0 | 128 | // Calls a subrountine that yields a fatal failure. |
michael@0 | 129 | TryTestSubroutine(); |
michael@0 | 130 | |
michael@0 | 131 | // Catches the fatal failure and aborts the test. |
michael@0 | 132 | // |
michael@0 | 133 | // When calling HasFatalFailure() inside a TEST, TEST_F, or test |
michael@0 | 134 | // fixture, the testing::Test:: prefix is not needed. |
michael@0 | 135 | if (HasFatalFailure()) return; |
michael@0 | 136 | |
michael@0 | 137 | // If we get here, something is wrong. |
michael@0 | 138 | FAIL() << "This should never be reached."; |
michael@0 | 139 | } |
michael@0 | 140 | |
michael@0 | 141 | // Tests HasFatalFailure() after a failed EXPECT check. |
michael@0 | 142 | TEST(FatalFailureTest, NonfatalFailureInSubroutine) { |
michael@0 | 143 | printf("(expecting a failure on false)\n"); |
michael@0 | 144 | EXPECT_TRUE(false); // Generates a nonfatal failure |
michael@0 | 145 | ASSERT_FALSE(HasFatalFailure()); // This should succeed. |
michael@0 | 146 | } |
michael@0 | 147 | |
michael@0 | 148 | // Tests interleaving user logging and Google Test assertions. |
michael@0 | 149 | TEST(LoggingTest, InterleavingLoggingAndAssertions) { |
michael@0 | 150 | static const int a[4] = { |
michael@0 | 151 | 3, 9, 2, 6 |
michael@0 | 152 | }; |
michael@0 | 153 | |
michael@0 | 154 | printf("(expecting 2 failures on (3) >= (a[i]))\n"); |
michael@0 | 155 | for (int i = 0; i < static_cast<int>(sizeof(a)/sizeof(*a)); i++) { |
michael@0 | 156 | printf("i == %d\n", i); |
michael@0 | 157 | EXPECT_GE(3, a[i]); |
michael@0 | 158 | } |
michael@0 | 159 | } |
michael@0 | 160 | |
michael@0 | 161 | // Tests the SCOPED_TRACE macro. |
michael@0 | 162 | |
michael@0 | 163 | // A helper function for testing SCOPED_TRACE. |
michael@0 | 164 | void SubWithoutTrace(int n) { |
michael@0 | 165 | EXPECT_EQ(1, n); |
michael@0 | 166 | ASSERT_EQ(2, n); |
michael@0 | 167 | } |
michael@0 | 168 | |
michael@0 | 169 | // Another helper function for testing SCOPED_TRACE. |
michael@0 | 170 | void SubWithTrace(int n) { |
michael@0 | 171 | SCOPED_TRACE(testing::Message() << "n = " << n); |
michael@0 | 172 | |
michael@0 | 173 | SubWithoutTrace(n); |
michael@0 | 174 | } |
michael@0 | 175 | |
michael@0 | 176 | // Tests that SCOPED_TRACE() obeys lexical scopes. |
michael@0 | 177 | TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, ObeysScopes) { |
michael@0 | 178 | printf("(expected to fail)\n"); |
michael@0 | 179 | |
michael@0 | 180 | // There should be no trace before SCOPED_TRACE() is invoked. |
michael@0 | 181 | ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and shouldn't have a trace."; |
michael@0 | 182 | |
michael@0 | 183 | { |
michael@0 | 184 | SCOPED_TRACE("Expected trace"); |
michael@0 | 185 | // After SCOPED_TRACE(), a failure in the current scope should contain |
michael@0 | 186 | // the trace. |
michael@0 | 187 | ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should have a trace."; |
michael@0 | 188 | } |
michael@0 | 189 | |
michael@0 | 190 | // Once the control leaves the scope of the SCOPED_TRACE(), there |
michael@0 | 191 | // should be no trace again. |
michael@0 | 192 | ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and shouldn't have a trace."; |
michael@0 | 193 | } |
michael@0 | 194 | |
michael@0 | 195 | // Tests that SCOPED_TRACE works inside a loop. |
michael@0 | 196 | TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksInLoop) { |
michael@0 | 197 | printf("(expected to fail)\n"); |
michael@0 | 198 | |
michael@0 | 199 | for (int i = 1; i <= 2; i++) { |
michael@0 | 200 | SCOPED_TRACE(testing::Message() << "i = " << i); |
michael@0 | 201 | |
michael@0 | 202 | SubWithoutTrace(i); |
michael@0 | 203 | } |
michael@0 | 204 | } |
michael@0 | 205 | |
michael@0 | 206 | // Tests that SCOPED_TRACE works in a subroutine. |
michael@0 | 207 | TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksInSubroutine) { |
michael@0 | 208 | printf("(expected to fail)\n"); |
michael@0 | 209 | |
michael@0 | 210 | SubWithTrace(1); |
michael@0 | 211 | SubWithTrace(2); |
michael@0 | 212 | } |
michael@0 | 213 | |
michael@0 | 214 | // Tests that SCOPED_TRACE can be nested. |
michael@0 | 215 | TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, CanBeNested) { |
michael@0 | 216 | printf("(expected to fail)\n"); |
michael@0 | 217 | |
michael@0 | 218 | SCOPED_TRACE(""); // A trace without a message. |
michael@0 | 219 | |
michael@0 | 220 | SubWithTrace(2); |
michael@0 | 221 | } |
michael@0 | 222 | |
michael@0 | 223 | // Tests that multiple SCOPED_TRACEs can be used in the same scope. |
michael@0 | 224 | TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, CanBeRepeated) { |
michael@0 | 225 | printf("(expected to fail)\n"); |
michael@0 | 226 | |
michael@0 | 227 | SCOPED_TRACE("A"); |
michael@0 | 228 | ADD_FAILURE() |
michael@0 | 229 | << "This failure is expected, and should contain trace point A."; |
michael@0 | 230 | |
michael@0 | 231 | SCOPED_TRACE("B"); |
michael@0 | 232 | ADD_FAILURE() |
michael@0 | 233 | << "This failure is expected, and should contain trace point A and B."; |
michael@0 | 234 | |
michael@0 | 235 | { |
michael@0 | 236 | SCOPED_TRACE("C"); |
michael@0 | 237 | ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should " |
michael@0 | 238 | << "contain trace point A, B, and C."; |
michael@0 | 239 | } |
michael@0 | 240 | |
michael@0 | 241 | SCOPED_TRACE("D"); |
michael@0 | 242 | ADD_FAILURE() << "This failure is expected, and should " |
michael@0 | 243 | << "contain trace point A, B, and D."; |
michael@0 | 244 | } |
michael@0 | 245 | |
michael@0 | 246 | #if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE |
michael@0 | 247 | // Tests that SCOPED_TRACE()s can be used concurrently from multiple |
michael@0 | 248 | // threads. Namely, an assertion should be affected by |
michael@0 | 249 | // SCOPED_TRACE()s in its own thread only. |
michael@0 | 250 | |
michael@0 | 251 | // Here's the sequence of actions that happen in the test: |
michael@0 | 252 | // |
michael@0 | 253 | // Thread A (main) | Thread B (spawned) |
michael@0 | 254 | // ===============================|================================ |
michael@0 | 255 | // spawns thread B | |
michael@0 | 256 | // -------------------------------+-------------------------------- |
michael@0 | 257 | // waits for n1 | SCOPED_TRACE("Trace B"); |
michael@0 | 258 | // | generates failure #1 |
michael@0 | 259 | // | notifies n1 |
michael@0 | 260 | // -------------------------------+-------------------------------- |
michael@0 | 261 | // SCOPED_TRACE("Trace A"); | waits for n2 |
michael@0 | 262 | // generates failure #2 | |
michael@0 | 263 | // notifies n2 | |
michael@0 | 264 | // -------------------------------|-------------------------------- |
michael@0 | 265 | // waits for n3 | generates failure #3 |
michael@0 | 266 | // | trace B dies |
michael@0 | 267 | // | generates failure #4 |
michael@0 | 268 | // | notifies n3 |
michael@0 | 269 | // -------------------------------|-------------------------------- |
michael@0 | 270 | // generates failure #5 | finishes |
michael@0 | 271 | // trace A dies | |
michael@0 | 272 | // generates failure #6 | |
michael@0 | 273 | // -------------------------------|-------------------------------- |
michael@0 | 274 | // waits for thread B to finish | |
michael@0 | 275 | |
michael@0 | 276 | struct CheckPoints { |
michael@0 | 277 | Notification n1; |
michael@0 | 278 | Notification n2; |
michael@0 | 279 | Notification n3; |
michael@0 | 280 | }; |
michael@0 | 281 | |
michael@0 | 282 | static void ThreadWithScopedTrace(CheckPoints* check_points) { |
michael@0 | 283 | { |
michael@0 | 284 | SCOPED_TRACE("Trace B"); |
michael@0 | 285 | ADD_FAILURE() |
michael@0 | 286 | << "Expected failure #1 (in thread B, only trace B alive)."; |
michael@0 | 287 | check_points->n1.Notify(); |
michael@0 | 288 | check_points->n2.WaitForNotification(); |
michael@0 | 289 | |
michael@0 | 290 | ADD_FAILURE() |
michael@0 | 291 | << "Expected failure #3 (in thread B, trace A & B both alive)."; |
michael@0 | 292 | } // Trace B dies here. |
michael@0 | 293 | ADD_FAILURE() |
michael@0 | 294 | << "Expected failure #4 (in thread B, only trace A alive)."; |
michael@0 | 295 | check_points->n3.Notify(); |
michael@0 | 296 | } |
michael@0 | 297 | |
michael@0 | 298 | TEST(SCOPED_TRACETest, WorksConcurrently) { |
michael@0 | 299 | printf("(expecting 6 failures)\n"); |
michael@0 | 300 | |
michael@0 | 301 | CheckPoints check_points; |
michael@0 | 302 | ThreadWithParam<CheckPoints*> thread(&ThreadWithScopedTrace, |
michael@0 | 303 | &check_points, |
michael@0 | 304 | NULL); |
michael@0 | 305 | check_points.n1.WaitForNotification(); |
michael@0 | 306 | |
michael@0 | 307 | { |
michael@0 | 308 | SCOPED_TRACE("Trace A"); |
michael@0 | 309 | ADD_FAILURE() |
michael@0 | 310 | << "Expected failure #2 (in thread A, trace A & B both alive)."; |
michael@0 | 311 | check_points.n2.Notify(); |
michael@0 | 312 | check_points.n3.WaitForNotification(); |
michael@0 | 313 | |
michael@0 | 314 | ADD_FAILURE() |
michael@0 | 315 | << "Expected failure #5 (in thread A, only trace A alive)."; |
michael@0 | 316 | } // Trace A dies here. |
michael@0 | 317 | ADD_FAILURE() |
michael@0 | 318 | << "Expected failure #6 (in thread A, no trace alive)."; |
michael@0 | 319 | thread.Join(); |
michael@0 | 320 | } |
michael@0 | 321 | #endif // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE |
michael@0 | 322 | |
michael@0 | 323 | TEST(DisabledTestsWarningTest, |
michael@0 | 324 | DISABLED_AlsoRunDisabledTestsFlagSuppressesWarning) { |
michael@0 | 325 | // This test body is intentionally empty. Its sole purpose is for |
michael@0 | 326 | // verifying that the --gtest_also_run_disabled_tests flag |
michael@0 | 327 | // suppresses the "YOU HAVE 12 DISABLED TESTS" warning at the end of |
michael@0 | 328 | // the test output. |
michael@0 | 329 | } |
michael@0 | 330 | |
michael@0 | 331 | // Tests using assertions outside of TEST and TEST_F. |
michael@0 | 332 | // |
michael@0 | 333 | // This function creates two failures intentionally. |
michael@0 | 334 | void AdHocTest() { |
michael@0 | 335 | printf("The non-test part of the code is expected to have 2 failures.\n\n"); |
michael@0 | 336 | EXPECT_TRUE(false); |
michael@0 | 337 | EXPECT_EQ(2, 3); |
michael@0 | 338 | } |
michael@0 | 339 | |
michael@0 | 340 | // Runs all TESTs, all TEST_Fs, and the ad hoc test. |
michael@0 | 341 | int RunAllTests() { |
michael@0 | 342 | AdHocTest(); |
michael@0 | 343 | return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); |
michael@0 | 344 | } |
michael@0 | 345 | |
michael@0 | 346 | // Tests non-fatal failures in the fixture constructor. |
michael@0 | 347 | class NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest : public testing::Test { |
michael@0 | 348 | protected: |
michael@0 | 349 | NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() { |
michael@0 | 350 | printf("(expecting 5 failures)\n"); |
michael@0 | 351 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #1, in the test fixture c'tor."; |
michael@0 | 352 | } |
michael@0 | 353 | |
michael@0 | 354 | ~NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() { |
michael@0 | 355 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #5, in the test fixture d'tor."; |
michael@0 | 356 | } |
michael@0 | 357 | |
michael@0 | 358 | virtual void SetUp() { |
michael@0 | 359 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #2, in SetUp()."; |
michael@0 | 360 | } |
michael@0 | 361 | |
michael@0 | 362 | virtual void TearDown() { |
michael@0 | 363 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #4, in TearDown."; |
michael@0 | 364 | } |
michael@0 | 365 | }; |
michael@0 | 366 | |
michael@0 | 367 | TEST_F(NonFatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest, FailureInConstructor) { |
michael@0 | 368 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #3, in the test body."; |
michael@0 | 369 | } |
michael@0 | 370 | |
michael@0 | 371 | // Tests fatal failures in the fixture constructor. |
michael@0 | 372 | class FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest : public testing::Test { |
michael@0 | 373 | protected: |
michael@0 | 374 | FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() { |
michael@0 | 375 | printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n"); |
michael@0 | 376 | Init(); |
michael@0 | 377 | } |
michael@0 | 378 | |
michael@0 | 379 | ~FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest() { |
michael@0 | 380 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #2, in the test fixture d'tor."; |
michael@0 | 381 | } |
michael@0 | 382 | |
michael@0 | 383 | virtual void SetUp() { |
michael@0 | 384 | ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in SetUp(). " |
michael@0 | 385 | << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor " |
michael@0 | 386 | << "had a fatal failure."; |
michael@0 | 387 | } |
michael@0 | 388 | |
michael@0 | 389 | virtual void TearDown() { |
michael@0 | 390 | ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in TearDown(). " |
michael@0 | 391 | << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor " |
michael@0 | 392 | << "had a fatal failure."; |
michael@0 | 393 | } |
michael@0 | 394 | |
michael@0 | 395 | private: |
michael@0 | 396 | void Init() { |
michael@0 | 397 | FAIL() << "Expected failure #1, in the test fixture c'tor."; |
michael@0 | 398 | } |
michael@0 | 399 | }; |
michael@0 | 400 | |
michael@0 | 401 | TEST_F(FatalFailureInFixtureConstructorTest, FailureInConstructor) { |
michael@0 | 402 | ADD_FAILURE() << "UNEXPECTED failure in the test body. " |
michael@0 | 403 | << "We should never get here, as the test fixture c'tor " |
michael@0 | 404 | << "had a fatal failure."; |
michael@0 | 405 | } |
michael@0 | 406 | |
michael@0 | 407 | // Tests non-fatal failures in SetUp(). |
michael@0 | 408 | class NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest : public testing::Test { |
michael@0 | 409 | protected: |
michael@0 | 410 | virtual ~NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest() { |
michael@0 | 411 | Deinit(); |
michael@0 | 412 | } |
michael@0 | 413 | |
michael@0 | 414 | virtual void SetUp() { |
michael@0 | 415 | printf("(expecting 4 failures)\n"); |
michael@0 | 416 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected failure #1, in SetUp()."; |
michael@0 | 417 | } |
michael@0 | 418 | |
michael@0 | 419 | virtual void TearDown() { |
michael@0 | 420 | FAIL() << "Expected failure #3, in TearDown()."; |
michael@0 | 421 | } |
michael@0 | 422 | private: |
michael@0 | 423 | void Deinit() { |
michael@0 | 424 | FAIL() << "Expected failure #4, in the test fixture d'tor."; |
michael@0 | 425 | } |
michael@0 | 426 | }; |
michael@0 | 427 | |
michael@0 | 428 | TEST_F(NonFatalFailureInSetUpTest, FailureInSetUp) { |
michael@0 | 429 | FAIL() << "Expected failure #2, in the test function."; |
michael@0 | 430 | } |
michael@0 | 431 | |
michael@0 | 432 | // Tests fatal failures in SetUp(). |
michael@0 | 433 | class FatalFailureInSetUpTest : public testing::Test { |
michael@0 | 434 | protected: |
michael@0 | 435 | virtual ~FatalFailureInSetUpTest() { |
michael@0 | 436 | Deinit(); |
michael@0 | 437 | } |
michael@0 | 438 | |
michael@0 | 439 | virtual void SetUp() { |
michael@0 | 440 | printf("(expecting 3 failures)\n"); |
michael@0 | 441 | FAIL() << "Expected failure #1, in SetUp()."; |
michael@0 | 442 | } |
michael@0 | 443 | |
michael@0 | 444 | virtual void TearDown() { |
michael@0 | 445 | FAIL() << "Expected failure #2, in TearDown()."; |
michael@0 | 446 | } |
michael@0 | 447 | private: |
michael@0 | 448 | void Deinit() { |
michael@0 | 449 | FAIL() << "Expected failure #3, in the test fixture d'tor."; |
michael@0 | 450 | } |
michael@0 | 451 | }; |
michael@0 | 452 | |
michael@0 | 453 | TEST_F(FatalFailureInSetUpTest, FailureInSetUp) { |
michael@0 | 454 | FAIL() << "UNEXPECTED failure in the test function. " |
michael@0 | 455 | << "We should never get here, as SetUp() failed."; |
michael@0 | 456 | } |
michael@0 | 457 | |
michael@0 | 458 | TEST(AddFailureAtTest, MessageContainsSpecifiedFileAndLineNumber) { |
michael@0 | 459 | ADD_FAILURE_AT("foo.cc", 42) << "Expected failure in foo.cc"; |
michael@0 | 460 | } |
michael@0 | 461 | |
michael@0 | 462 | #if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE |
michael@0 | 463 | |
michael@0 | 464 | // A unary function that may die. |
michael@0 | 465 | void DieIf(bool should_die) { |
michael@0 | 466 | GTEST_CHECK_(!should_die) << " - death inside DieIf()."; |
michael@0 | 467 | } |
michael@0 | 468 | |
michael@0 | 469 | // Tests running death tests in a multi-threaded context. |
michael@0 | 470 | |
michael@0 | 471 | // Used for coordination between the main and the spawn thread. |
michael@0 | 472 | struct SpawnThreadNotifications { |
michael@0 | 473 | SpawnThreadNotifications() {} |
michael@0 | 474 | |
michael@0 | 475 | Notification spawn_thread_started; |
michael@0 | 476 | Notification spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate; |
michael@0 | 477 | |
michael@0 | 478 | private: |
michael@0 | 479 | GTEST_DISALLOW_COPY_AND_ASSIGN_(SpawnThreadNotifications); |
michael@0 | 480 | }; |
michael@0 | 481 | |
michael@0 | 482 | // The function to be executed in the thread spawn by the |
michael@0 | 483 | // MultipleThreads test (below). |
michael@0 | 484 | static void ThreadRoutine(SpawnThreadNotifications* notifications) { |
michael@0 | 485 | // Signals the main thread that this thread has started. |
michael@0 | 486 | notifications->spawn_thread_started.Notify(); |
michael@0 | 487 | |
michael@0 | 488 | // Waits for permission to finish from the main thread. |
michael@0 | 489 | notifications->spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate.WaitForNotification(); |
michael@0 | 490 | } |
michael@0 | 491 | |
michael@0 | 492 | // This is a death-test test, but it's not named with a DeathTest |
michael@0 | 493 | // suffix. It starts threads which might interfere with later |
michael@0 | 494 | // death tests, so it must run after all other death tests. |
michael@0 | 495 | class DeathTestAndMultiThreadsTest : public testing::Test { |
michael@0 | 496 | protected: |
michael@0 | 497 | // Starts a thread and waits for it to begin. |
michael@0 | 498 | virtual void SetUp() { |
michael@0 | 499 | thread_.reset(new ThreadWithParam<SpawnThreadNotifications*>( |
michael@0 | 500 | &ThreadRoutine, ¬ifications_, NULL)); |
michael@0 | 501 | notifications_.spawn_thread_started.WaitForNotification(); |
michael@0 | 502 | } |
michael@0 | 503 | // Tells the thread to finish, and reaps it. |
michael@0 | 504 | // Depending on the version of the thread library in use, |
michael@0 | 505 | // a manager thread might still be left running that will interfere |
michael@0 | 506 | // with later death tests. This is unfortunate, but this class |
michael@0 | 507 | // cleans up after itself as best it can. |
michael@0 | 508 | virtual void TearDown() { |
michael@0 | 509 | notifications_.spawn_thread_ok_to_terminate.Notify(); |
michael@0 | 510 | } |
michael@0 | 511 | |
michael@0 | 512 | private: |
michael@0 | 513 | SpawnThreadNotifications notifications_; |
michael@0 | 514 | scoped_ptr<ThreadWithParam<SpawnThreadNotifications*> > thread_; |
michael@0 | 515 | }; |
michael@0 | 516 | |
michael@0 | 517 | #endif // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE |
michael@0 | 518 | |
michael@0 | 519 | // The MixedUpTestCaseTest test case verifies that Google Test will fail a |
michael@0 | 520 | // test if it uses a different fixture class than what other tests in |
michael@0 | 521 | // the same test case use. It deliberately contains two fixture |
michael@0 | 522 | // classes with the same name but defined in different namespaces. |
michael@0 | 523 | |
michael@0 | 524 | // The MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest test case verifies that |
michael@0 | 525 | // when the user defines two tests with the same test case name AND |
michael@0 | 526 | // same test name (but in different namespaces), the second test will |
michael@0 | 527 | // fail. |
michael@0 | 528 | |
michael@0 | 529 | namespace foo { |
michael@0 | 530 | |
michael@0 | 531 | class MixedUpTestCaseTest : public testing::Test { |
michael@0 | 532 | }; |
michael@0 | 533 | |
michael@0 | 534 | TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, FirstTestFromNamespaceFoo) {} |
michael@0 | 535 | TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, SecondTestFromNamespaceFoo) {} |
michael@0 | 536 | |
michael@0 | 537 | class MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest : public testing::Test { |
michael@0 | 538 | }; |
michael@0 | 539 | |
michael@0 | 540 | TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest, |
michael@0 | 541 | TheSecondTestWithThisNameShouldFail) {} |
michael@0 | 542 | |
michael@0 | 543 | } // namespace foo |
michael@0 | 544 | |
michael@0 | 545 | namespace bar { |
michael@0 | 546 | |
michael@0 | 547 | class MixedUpTestCaseTest : public testing::Test { |
michael@0 | 548 | }; |
michael@0 | 549 | |
michael@0 | 550 | // The following two tests are expected to fail. We rely on the |
michael@0 | 551 | // golden file to check that Google Test generates the right error message. |
michael@0 | 552 | TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, ThisShouldFail) {} |
michael@0 | 553 | TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseTest, ThisShouldFailToo) {} |
michael@0 | 554 | |
michael@0 | 555 | class MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest : public testing::Test { |
michael@0 | 556 | }; |
michael@0 | 557 | |
michael@0 | 558 | // Expected to fail. We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test |
michael@0 | 559 | // generates the right error message. |
michael@0 | 560 | TEST_F(MixedUpTestCaseWithSameTestNameTest, |
michael@0 | 561 | TheSecondTestWithThisNameShouldFail) {} |
michael@0 | 562 | |
michael@0 | 563 | } // namespace bar |
michael@0 | 564 | |
michael@0 | 565 | // The following two test cases verify that Google Test catches the user |
michael@0 | 566 | // error of mixing TEST and TEST_F in the same test case. The first |
michael@0 | 567 | // test case checks the scenario where TEST_F appears before TEST, and |
michael@0 | 568 | // the second one checks where TEST appears before TEST_F. |
michael@0 | 569 | |
michael@0 | 570 | class TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case : public testing::Test { |
michael@0 | 571 | }; |
michael@0 | 572 | |
michael@0 | 573 | TEST_F(TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST_F) {} |
michael@0 | 574 | |
michael@0 | 575 | // Expected to fail. We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test |
michael@0 | 576 | // generates the right error message. |
michael@0 | 577 | TEST(TEST_F_before_TEST_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTESTAndShouldFail) {} |
michael@0 | 578 | |
michael@0 | 579 | class TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case : public testing::Test { |
michael@0 | 580 | }; |
michael@0 | 581 | |
michael@0 | 582 | TEST(TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST) {} |
michael@0 | 583 | |
michael@0 | 584 | // Expected to fail. We rely on the golden file to check that Google Test |
michael@0 | 585 | // generates the right error message. |
michael@0 | 586 | TEST_F(TEST_before_TEST_F_in_same_test_case, DefinedUsingTEST_FAndShouldFail) { |
michael@0 | 587 | } |
michael@0 | 588 | |
michael@0 | 589 | // Used for testing EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() and EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(). |
michael@0 | 590 | int global_integer = 0; |
michael@0 | 591 | |
michael@0 | 592 | // Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() can reference global variables. |
michael@0 | 593 | TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, CanReferenceGlobalVariables) { |
michael@0 | 594 | global_integer = 0; |
michael@0 | 595 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ |
michael@0 | 596 | EXPECT_EQ(1, global_integer) << "Expected non-fatal failure."; |
michael@0 | 597 | }, "Expected non-fatal failure."); |
michael@0 | 598 | } |
michael@0 | 599 | |
michael@0 | 600 | // Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() can reference local variables |
michael@0 | 601 | // (static or not). |
michael@0 | 602 | TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, CanReferenceLocalVariables) { |
michael@0 | 603 | int m = 0; |
michael@0 | 604 | static int n; |
michael@0 | 605 | n = 1; |
michael@0 | 606 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ |
michael@0 | 607 | EXPECT_EQ(m, n) << "Expected non-fatal failure."; |
michael@0 | 608 | }, "Expected non-fatal failure."); |
michael@0 | 609 | } |
michael@0 | 610 | |
michael@0 | 611 | // Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() succeeds when there is exactly |
michael@0 | 612 | // one non-fatal failure and no fatal failure. |
michael@0 | 613 | TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, SucceedsWhenThereIsOneNonfatalFailure) { |
michael@0 | 614 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ |
michael@0 | 615 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure."; |
michael@0 | 616 | }, "Expected non-fatal failure."); |
michael@0 | 617 | } |
michael@0 | 618 | |
michael@0 | 619 | // Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is no |
michael@0 | 620 | // non-fatal failure. |
michael@0 | 621 | TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsNoNonfatalFailure) { |
michael@0 | 622 | printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
michael@0 | 623 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ |
michael@0 | 624 | }, ""); |
michael@0 | 625 | } |
michael@0 | 626 | |
michael@0 | 627 | // Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there are two |
michael@0 | 628 | // non-fatal failures. |
michael@0 | 629 | TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereAreTwoNonfatalFailures) { |
michael@0 | 630 | printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
michael@0 | 631 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ |
michael@0 | 632 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure 1."; |
michael@0 | 633 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure 2."; |
michael@0 | 634 | }, ""); |
michael@0 | 635 | } |
michael@0 | 636 | |
michael@0 | 637 | // Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is one fatal |
michael@0 | 638 | // failure. |
michael@0 | 639 | TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsOneFatalFailure) { |
michael@0 | 640 | printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
michael@0 | 641 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ |
michael@0 | 642 | FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; |
michael@0 | 643 | }, ""); |
michael@0 | 644 | } |
michael@0 | 645 | |
michael@0 | 646 | // Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being |
michael@0 | 647 | // tested returns. |
michael@0 | 648 | TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementReturns) { |
michael@0 | 649 | printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
michael@0 | 650 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ |
michael@0 | 651 | return; |
michael@0 | 652 | }, ""); |
michael@0 | 653 | } |
michael@0 | 654 | |
michael@0 | 655 | #if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS |
michael@0 | 656 | |
michael@0 | 657 | // Tests that EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being |
michael@0 | 658 | // tested throws. |
michael@0 | 659 | TEST(ExpectNonfatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementThrows) { |
michael@0 | 660 | printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
michael@0 | 661 | try { |
michael@0 | 662 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE({ |
michael@0 | 663 | throw 0; |
michael@0 | 664 | }, ""); |
michael@0 | 665 | } catch(int) { // NOLINT |
michael@0 | 666 | } |
michael@0 | 667 | } |
michael@0 | 668 | |
michael@0 | 669 | #endif // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS |
michael@0 | 670 | |
michael@0 | 671 | // Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() can reference global variables. |
michael@0 | 672 | TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, CanReferenceGlobalVariables) { |
michael@0 | 673 | global_integer = 0; |
michael@0 | 674 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ |
michael@0 | 675 | ASSERT_EQ(1, global_integer) << "Expected fatal failure."; |
michael@0 | 676 | }, "Expected fatal failure."); |
michael@0 | 677 | } |
michael@0 | 678 | |
michael@0 | 679 | // Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() can reference local static |
michael@0 | 680 | // variables. |
michael@0 | 681 | TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, CanReferenceLocalStaticVariables) { |
michael@0 | 682 | static int n; |
michael@0 | 683 | n = 1; |
michael@0 | 684 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ |
michael@0 | 685 | ASSERT_EQ(0, n) << "Expected fatal failure."; |
michael@0 | 686 | }, "Expected fatal failure."); |
michael@0 | 687 | } |
michael@0 | 688 | |
michael@0 | 689 | // Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() succeeds when there is exactly |
michael@0 | 690 | // one fatal failure and no non-fatal failure. |
michael@0 | 691 | TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, SucceedsWhenThereIsOneFatalFailure) { |
michael@0 | 692 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ |
michael@0 | 693 | FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; |
michael@0 | 694 | }, "Expected fatal failure."); |
michael@0 | 695 | } |
michael@0 | 696 | |
michael@0 | 697 | // Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is no fatal |
michael@0 | 698 | // failure. |
michael@0 | 699 | TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsNoFatalFailure) { |
michael@0 | 700 | printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
michael@0 | 701 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ |
michael@0 | 702 | }, ""); |
michael@0 | 703 | } |
michael@0 | 704 | |
michael@0 | 705 | // A helper for generating a fatal failure. |
michael@0 | 706 | void FatalFailure() { |
michael@0 | 707 | FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; |
michael@0 | 708 | } |
michael@0 | 709 | |
michael@0 | 710 | // Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there are two |
michael@0 | 711 | // fatal failures. |
michael@0 | 712 | TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereAreTwoFatalFailures) { |
michael@0 | 713 | printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
michael@0 | 714 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ |
michael@0 | 715 | FatalFailure(); |
michael@0 | 716 | FatalFailure(); |
michael@0 | 717 | }, ""); |
michael@0 | 718 | } |
michael@0 | 719 | |
michael@0 | 720 | // Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when there is one non-fatal |
michael@0 | 721 | // failure. |
michael@0 | 722 | TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenThereIsOneNonfatalFailure) { |
michael@0 | 723 | printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
michael@0 | 724 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ |
michael@0 | 725 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure."; |
michael@0 | 726 | }, ""); |
michael@0 | 727 | } |
michael@0 | 728 | |
michael@0 | 729 | // Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being |
michael@0 | 730 | // tested returns. |
michael@0 | 731 | TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementReturns) { |
michael@0 | 732 | printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
michael@0 | 733 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ |
michael@0 | 734 | return; |
michael@0 | 735 | }, ""); |
michael@0 | 736 | } |
michael@0 | 737 | |
michael@0 | 738 | #if GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS |
michael@0 | 739 | |
michael@0 | 740 | // Tests that EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE() fails when the statement being |
michael@0 | 741 | // tested throws. |
michael@0 | 742 | TEST(ExpectFatalFailureTest, FailsWhenStatementThrows) { |
michael@0 | 743 | printf("(expecting a failure)\n"); |
michael@0 | 744 | try { |
michael@0 | 745 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE({ |
michael@0 | 746 | throw 0; |
michael@0 | 747 | }, ""); |
michael@0 | 748 | } catch(int) { // NOLINT |
michael@0 | 749 | } |
michael@0 | 750 | } |
michael@0 | 751 | |
michael@0 | 752 | #endif // GTEST_HAS_EXCEPTIONS |
michael@0 | 753 | |
michael@0 | 754 | // This #ifdef block tests the output of typed tests. |
michael@0 | 755 | #if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST |
michael@0 | 756 | |
michael@0 | 757 | template <typename T> |
michael@0 | 758 | class TypedTest : public testing::Test { |
michael@0 | 759 | }; |
michael@0 | 760 | |
michael@0 | 761 | TYPED_TEST_CASE(TypedTest, testing::Types<int>); |
michael@0 | 762 | |
michael@0 | 763 | TYPED_TEST(TypedTest, Success) { |
michael@0 | 764 | EXPECT_EQ(0, TypeParam()); |
michael@0 | 765 | } |
michael@0 | 766 | |
michael@0 | 767 | TYPED_TEST(TypedTest, Failure) { |
michael@0 | 768 | EXPECT_EQ(1, TypeParam()) << "Expected failure"; |
michael@0 | 769 | } |
michael@0 | 770 | |
michael@0 | 771 | #endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST |
michael@0 | 772 | |
michael@0 | 773 | // This #ifdef block tests the output of type-parameterized tests. |
michael@0 | 774 | #if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P |
michael@0 | 775 | |
michael@0 | 776 | template <typename T> |
michael@0 | 777 | class TypedTestP : public testing::Test { |
michael@0 | 778 | }; |
michael@0 | 779 | |
michael@0 | 780 | TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(TypedTestP); |
michael@0 | 781 | |
michael@0 | 782 | TYPED_TEST_P(TypedTestP, Success) { |
michael@0 | 783 | EXPECT_EQ(0U, TypeParam()); |
michael@0 | 784 | } |
michael@0 | 785 | |
michael@0 | 786 | TYPED_TEST_P(TypedTestP, Failure) { |
michael@0 | 787 | EXPECT_EQ(1U, TypeParam()) << "Expected failure"; |
michael@0 | 788 | } |
michael@0 | 789 | |
michael@0 | 790 | REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(TypedTestP, Success, Failure); |
michael@0 | 791 | |
michael@0 | 792 | typedef testing::Types<unsigned char, unsigned int> UnsignedTypes; |
michael@0 | 793 | INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(Unsigned, TypedTestP, UnsignedTypes); |
michael@0 | 794 | |
michael@0 | 795 | #endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P |
michael@0 | 796 | |
michael@0 | 797 | #if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST |
michael@0 | 798 | |
michael@0 | 799 | // We rely on the golden file to verify that tests whose test case |
michael@0 | 800 | // name ends with DeathTest are run first. |
michael@0 | 801 | |
michael@0 | 802 | TEST(ADeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) { |
michael@0 | 803 | } |
michael@0 | 804 | |
michael@0 | 805 | # if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST |
michael@0 | 806 | |
michael@0 | 807 | // We rely on the golden file to verify that typed tests whose test |
michael@0 | 808 | // case name ends with DeathTest are run first. |
michael@0 | 809 | |
michael@0 | 810 | template <typename T> |
michael@0 | 811 | class ATypedDeathTest : public testing::Test { |
michael@0 | 812 | }; |
michael@0 | 813 | |
michael@0 | 814 | typedef testing::Types<int, double> NumericTypes; |
michael@0 | 815 | TYPED_TEST_CASE(ATypedDeathTest, NumericTypes); |
michael@0 | 816 | |
michael@0 | 817 | TYPED_TEST(ATypedDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) { |
michael@0 | 818 | } |
michael@0 | 819 | |
michael@0 | 820 | # endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST |
michael@0 | 821 | |
michael@0 | 822 | # if GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P |
michael@0 | 823 | |
michael@0 | 824 | |
michael@0 | 825 | // We rely on the golden file to verify that type-parameterized tests |
michael@0 | 826 | // whose test case name ends with DeathTest are run first. |
michael@0 | 827 | |
michael@0 | 828 | template <typename T> |
michael@0 | 829 | class ATypeParamDeathTest : public testing::Test { |
michael@0 | 830 | }; |
michael@0 | 831 | |
michael@0 | 832 | TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(ATypeParamDeathTest); |
michael@0 | 833 | |
michael@0 | 834 | TYPED_TEST_P(ATypeParamDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst) { |
michael@0 | 835 | } |
michael@0 | 836 | |
michael@0 | 837 | REGISTER_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(ATypeParamDeathTest, ShouldRunFirst); |
michael@0 | 838 | |
michael@0 | 839 | INSTANTIATE_TYPED_TEST_CASE_P(My, ATypeParamDeathTest, NumericTypes); |
michael@0 | 840 | |
michael@0 | 841 | # endif // GTEST_HAS_TYPED_TEST_P |
michael@0 | 842 | |
michael@0 | 843 | #endif // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST |
michael@0 | 844 | |
michael@0 | 845 | // Tests various failure conditions of |
michael@0 | 846 | // EXPECT_{,NON}FATAL_FAILURE{,_ON_ALL_THREADS}. |
michael@0 | 847 | class ExpectFailureTest : public testing::Test { |
michael@0 | 848 | public: // Must be public and not protected due to a bug in g++ 3.4.2. |
michael@0 | 849 | enum FailureMode { |
michael@0 | 850 | FATAL_FAILURE, |
michael@0 | 851 | NONFATAL_FAILURE |
michael@0 | 852 | }; |
michael@0 | 853 | static void AddFailure(FailureMode failure) { |
michael@0 | 854 | if (failure == FATAL_FAILURE) { |
michael@0 | 855 | FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; |
michael@0 | 856 | } else { |
michael@0 | 857 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure."; |
michael@0 | 858 | } |
michael@0 | 859 | } |
michael@0 | 860 | }; |
michael@0 | 861 | |
michael@0 | 862 | TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectFatalFailure) { |
michael@0 | 863 | // Expected fatal failure, but succeeds. |
michael@0 | 864 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
michael@0 | 865 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(SUCCEED(), "Expected fatal failure."); |
michael@0 | 866 | // Expected fatal failure, but got a non-fatal failure. |
michael@0 | 867 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
michael@0 | 868 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), "Expected non-fatal " |
michael@0 | 869 | "failure."); |
michael@0 | 870 | // Wrong message. |
michael@0 | 871 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
michael@0 | 872 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), "Some other fatal failure " |
michael@0 | 873 | "expected."); |
michael@0 | 874 | } |
michael@0 | 875 | |
michael@0 | 876 | TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectNonFatalFailure) { |
michael@0 | 877 | // Expected non-fatal failure, but succeeds. |
michael@0 | 878 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
michael@0 | 879 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(SUCCEED(), "Expected non-fatal failure."); |
michael@0 | 880 | // Expected non-fatal failure, but got a fatal failure. |
michael@0 | 881 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
michael@0 | 882 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), "Expected fatal failure."); |
michael@0 | 883 | // Wrong message. |
michael@0 | 884 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
michael@0 | 885 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), "Some other non-fatal " |
michael@0 | 886 | "failure."); |
michael@0 | 887 | } |
michael@0 | 888 | |
michael@0 | 889 | #if GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE |
michael@0 | 890 | |
michael@0 | 891 | class ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest : public ExpectFailureTest { |
michael@0 | 892 | protected: |
michael@0 | 893 | static void AddFailureInOtherThread(FailureMode failure) { |
michael@0 | 894 | ThreadWithParam<FailureMode> thread(&AddFailure, failure, NULL); |
michael@0 | 895 | thread.Join(); |
michael@0 | 896 | } |
michael@0 | 897 | }; |
michael@0 | 898 | |
michael@0 | 899 | TEST_F(ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest, ExpectFatalFailure) { |
michael@0 | 900 | // We only intercept the current thread. |
michael@0 | 901 | printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n"); |
michael@0 | 902 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE(AddFailureInOtherThread(FATAL_FAILURE), |
michael@0 | 903 | "Expected fatal failure."); |
michael@0 | 904 | } |
michael@0 | 905 | |
michael@0 | 906 | TEST_F(ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest, ExpectNonFatalFailure) { |
michael@0 | 907 | // We only intercept the current thread. |
michael@0 | 908 | printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n"); |
michael@0 | 909 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE(AddFailureInOtherThread(NONFATAL_FAILURE), |
michael@0 | 910 | "Expected non-fatal failure."); |
michael@0 | 911 | } |
michael@0 | 912 | |
michael@0 | 913 | typedef ExpectFailureWithThreadsTest ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterTest; |
michael@0 | 914 | |
michael@0 | 915 | // Tests that the ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter only catches failures from |
michael@0 | 916 | // the current thread if it is instantiated with INTERCEPT_ONLY_CURRENT_THREAD. |
michael@0 | 917 | TEST_F(ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporterTest, InterceptOnlyCurrentThread) { |
michael@0 | 918 | printf("(expecting 2 failures)\n"); |
michael@0 | 919 | TestPartResultArray results; |
michael@0 | 920 | { |
michael@0 | 921 | ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter reporter( |
michael@0 | 922 | ScopedFakeTestPartResultReporter::INTERCEPT_ONLY_CURRENT_THREAD, |
michael@0 | 923 | &results); |
michael@0 | 924 | AddFailureInOtherThread(FATAL_FAILURE); |
michael@0 | 925 | AddFailureInOtherThread(NONFATAL_FAILURE); |
michael@0 | 926 | } |
michael@0 | 927 | // The two failures should not have been intercepted. |
michael@0 | 928 | EXPECT_EQ(0, results.size()) << "This shouldn't fail."; |
michael@0 | 929 | } |
michael@0 | 930 | |
michael@0 | 931 | #endif // GTEST_IS_THREADSAFE |
michael@0 | 932 | |
michael@0 | 933 | TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectFatalFailureOnAllThreads) { |
michael@0 | 934 | // Expected fatal failure, but succeeds. |
michael@0 | 935 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
michael@0 | 936 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(SUCCEED(), "Expected fatal failure."); |
michael@0 | 937 | // Expected fatal failure, but got a non-fatal failure. |
michael@0 | 938 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
michael@0 | 939 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), |
michael@0 | 940 | "Expected non-fatal failure."); |
michael@0 | 941 | // Wrong message. |
michael@0 | 942 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
michael@0 | 943 | EXPECT_FATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), |
michael@0 | 944 | "Some other fatal failure expected."); |
michael@0 | 945 | } |
michael@0 | 946 | |
michael@0 | 947 | TEST_F(ExpectFailureTest, ExpectNonFatalFailureOnAllThreads) { |
michael@0 | 948 | // Expected non-fatal failure, but succeeds. |
michael@0 | 949 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
michael@0 | 950 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(SUCCEED(), "Expected non-fatal " |
michael@0 | 951 | "failure."); |
michael@0 | 952 | // Expected non-fatal failure, but got a fatal failure. |
michael@0 | 953 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
michael@0 | 954 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(FATAL_FAILURE), |
michael@0 | 955 | "Expected fatal failure."); |
michael@0 | 956 | // Wrong message. |
michael@0 | 957 | printf("(expecting 1 failure)\n"); |
michael@0 | 958 | EXPECT_NONFATAL_FAILURE_ON_ALL_THREADS(AddFailure(NONFATAL_FAILURE), |
michael@0 | 959 | "Some other non-fatal failure."); |
michael@0 | 960 | } |
michael@0 | 961 | |
michael@0 | 962 | |
michael@0 | 963 | // Two test environments for testing testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(). |
michael@0 | 964 | |
michael@0 | 965 | class FooEnvironment : public testing::Environment { |
michael@0 | 966 | public: |
michael@0 | 967 | virtual void SetUp() { |
michael@0 | 968 | printf("%s", "FooEnvironment::SetUp() called.\n"); |
michael@0 | 969 | } |
michael@0 | 970 | |
michael@0 | 971 | virtual void TearDown() { |
michael@0 | 972 | printf("%s", "FooEnvironment::TearDown() called.\n"); |
michael@0 | 973 | FAIL() << "Expected fatal failure."; |
michael@0 | 974 | } |
michael@0 | 975 | }; |
michael@0 | 976 | |
michael@0 | 977 | class BarEnvironment : public testing::Environment { |
michael@0 | 978 | public: |
michael@0 | 979 | virtual void SetUp() { |
michael@0 | 980 | printf("%s", "BarEnvironment::SetUp() called.\n"); |
michael@0 | 981 | } |
michael@0 | 982 | |
michael@0 | 983 | virtual void TearDown() { |
michael@0 | 984 | printf("%s", "BarEnvironment::TearDown() called.\n"); |
michael@0 | 985 | ADD_FAILURE() << "Expected non-fatal failure."; |
michael@0 | 986 | } |
michael@0 | 987 | }; |
michael@0 | 988 | |
michael@0 | 989 | bool GTEST_FLAG(internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests) = false; |
michael@0 | 990 | |
michael@0 | 991 | // The main function. |
michael@0 | 992 | // |
michael@0 | 993 | // The idea is to use Google Test to run all the tests we have defined (some |
michael@0 | 994 | // of them are intended to fail), and then compare the test results |
michael@0 | 995 | // with the "golden" file. |
michael@0 | 996 | int main(int argc, char **argv) { |
michael@0 | 997 | testing::GTEST_FLAG(print_time) = false; |
michael@0 | 998 | |
michael@0 | 999 | // We just run the tests, knowing some of them are intended to fail. |
michael@0 | 1000 | // We will use a separate Python script to compare the output of |
michael@0 | 1001 | // this program with the golden file. |
michael@0 | 1002 | |
michael@0 | 1003 | // It's hard to test InitGoogleTest() directly, as it has many |
michael@0 | 1004 | // global side effects. The following line serves as a sanity test |
michael@0 | 1005 | // for it. |
michael@0 | 1006 | testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv); |
michael@0 | 1007 | if (argc >= 2 && |
michael@0 | 1008 | String(argv[1]) == "--gtest_internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests") |
michael@0 | 1009 | GTEST_FLAG(internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests) = true; |
michael@0 | 1010 | |
michael@0 | 1011 | #if GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST |
michael@0 | 1012 | if (testing::internal::GTEST_FLAG(internal_run_death_test) != "") { |
michael@0 | 1013 | // Skip the usual output capturing if we're running as the child |
michael@0 | 1014 | // process of an threadsafe-style death test. |
michael@0 | 1015 | # if GTEST_OS_WINDOWS |
michael@0 | 1016 | posix::FReopen("nul:", "w", stdout); |
michael@0 | 1017 | # else |
michael@0 | 1018 | posix::FReopen("/dev/null", "w", stdout); |
michael@0 | 1019 | # endif // GTEST_OS_WINDOWS |
michael@0 | 1020 | return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); |
michael@0 | 1021 | } |
michael@0 | 1022 | #endif // GTEST_HAS_DEATH_TEST |
michael@0 | 1023 | |
michael@0 | 1024 | if (GTEST_FLAG(internal_skip_environment_and_ad_hoc_tests)) |
michael@0 | 1025 | return RUN_ALL_TESTS(); |
michael@0 | 1026 | |
michael@0 | 1027 | // Registers two global test environments. |
michael@0 | 1028 | // The golden file verifies that they are set up in the order they |
michael@0 | 1029 | // are registered, and torn down in the reverse order. |
michael@0 | 1030 | testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new FooEnvironment); |
michael@0 | 1031 | testing::AddGlobalTestEnvironment(new BarEnvironment); |
michael@0 | 1032 | |
michael@0 | 1033 | return RunAllTests(); |
michael@0 | 1034 | } |