security/nss/lib/freebl/mpi/doc/square.txt

changeset 0
6474c204b198
     1.1 --- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
     1.2 +++ b/security/nss/lib/freebl/mpi/doc/square.txt	Wed Dec 31 06:09:35 2014 +0100
     1.3 @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
     1.4 +Squaring Algorithm
     1.5 +
     1.6 +When you are squaring a value, you can take advantage of the fact that
     1.7 +half the multiplications performed by the more general multiplication
     1.8 +algorithm (see 'mul.txt' for a description) are redundant when the
     1.9 +multiplicand equals the multiplier.
    1.10 +
    1.11 +In particular, the modified algorithm is:
    1.12 +
    1.13 +k = 0
    1.14 +for j <- 0 to (#a - 1)
    1.15 +  w = c[2*j] + (a[j] ^ 2);
    1.16 +  k = w div R
    1.17 +
    1.18 +  for i <- j+1 to (#a - 1)
    1.19 +    w = (2 * a[j] * a[i]) + k + c[i+j]
    1.20 +    c[i+j] = w mod R
    1.21 +    k = w div R
    1.22 +  endfor
    1.23 +  c[i+j] = k;
    1.24 +  k = 0;
    1.25 +endfor
    1.26 +
    1.27 +On the surface, this looks identical to the multiplication algorithm;
    1.28 +however, note the following differences:
    1.29 +
    1.30 +  - precomputation of the leading term in the outer loop
    1.31 +
    1.32 +  - i runs from j+1 instead of from zero
    1.33 +
    1.34 +  - doubling of a[i] * a[j] in the inner product
    1.35 +
    1.36 +Unfortunately, the construction of the inner product is such that we
    1.37 +need more than two digits to represent the inner product, in some
    1.38 +cases.  In a C implementation, this means that some gymnastics must be
    1.39 +performed in order to handle overflow, for which C has no direct
    1.40 +abstraction.  We do this by observing the following:
    1.41 +
    1.42 +If we have multiplied a[i] and a[j], and the product is more than half
    1.43 +the maximum value expressible in two digits, then doubling this result
    1.44 +will overflow into a third digit.  If this occurs, we take note of the
    1.45 +overflow, and double it anyway -- C integer arithmetic ignores
    1.46 +overflow, so the two digits we get back should still be valid, modulo
    1.47 +the overflow.
    1.48 +
    1.49 +Having doubled this value, we now have to add in the remainders and
    1.50 +the digits already computed by earlier steps.  If we did not overflow
    1.51 +in the previous step, we might still cause an overflow here.  That
    1.52 +will happen whenever the maximum value expressible in two digits, less
    1.53 +the amount we have to add, is greater than the result of the previous
    1.54 +step.  Thus, the overflow computation is:
    1.55 +
    1.56 +
    1.57 +  u = 0
    1.58 +  w = a[i] * a[j]
    1.59 +
    1.60 +  if(w > (R - 1)/ 2)
    1.61 +    u = 1;
    1.62 +
    1.63 +  w = w * 2
    1.64 +  v = c[i + j] + k
    1.65 +
    1.66 +  if(u == 0 && (R - 1 - v) < w)
    1.67 +    u = 1
    1.68 +
    1.69 +If there is an overflow, u will be 1, otherwise u will be 0.  The rest
    1.70 +of the parameters are the same as they are in the above description.
    1.71 +
    1.72 +------------------------------------------------------------------
    1.73 + This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
    1.74 + # License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this
    1.75 + # file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/.

mercurial