security/nss/lib/freebl/mpi/doc/square.txt

Wed, 31 Dec 2014 06:09:35 +0100

author
Michael Schloh von Bennewitz <michael@schloh.com>
date
Wed, 31 Dec 2014 06:09:35 +0100
changeset 0
6474c204b198
permissions
-rw-r--r--

Cloned upstream origin tor-browser at tor-browser-31.3.0esr-4.5-1-build1
revision ID fc1c9ff7c1b2defdbc039f12214767608f46423f for hacking purpose.

michael@0 1 Squaring Algorithm
michael@0 2
michael@0 3 When you are squaring a value, you can take advantage of the fact that
michael@0 4 half the multiplications performed by the more general multiplication
michael@0 5 algorithm (see 'mul.txt' for a description) are redundant when the
michael@0 6 multiplicand equals the multiplier.
michael@0 7
michael@0 8 In particular, the modified algorithm is:
michael@0 9
michael@0 10 k = 0
michael@0 11 for j <- 0 to (#a - 1)
michael@0 12 w = c[2*j] + (a[j] ^ 2);
michael@0 13 k = w div R
michael@0 14
michael@0 15 for i <- j+1 to (#a - 1)
michael@0 16 w = (2 * a[j] * a[i]) + k + c[i+j]
michael@0 17 c[i+j] = w mod R
michael@0 18 k = w div R
michael@0 19 endfor
michael@0 20 c[i+j] = k;
michael@0 21 k = 0;
michael@0 22 endfor
michael@0 23
michael@0 24 On the surface, this looks identical to the multiplication algorithm;
michael@0 25 however, note the following differences:
michael@0 26
michael@0 27 - precomputation of the leading term in the outer loop
michael@0 28
michael@0 29 - i runs from j+1 instead of from zero
michael@0 30
michael@0 31 - doubling of a[i] * a[j] in the inner product
michael@0 32
michael@0 33 Unfortunately, the construction of the inner product is such that we
michael@0 34 need more than two digits to represent the inner product, in some
michael@0 35 cases. In a C implementation, this means that some gymnastics must be
michael@0 36 performed in order to handle overflow, for which C has no direct
michael@0 37 abstraction. We do this by observing the following:
michael@0 38
michael@0 39 If we have multiplied a[i] and a[j], and the product is more than half
michael@0 40 the maximum value expressible in two digits, then doubling this result
michael@0 41 will overflow into a third digit. If this occurs, we take note of the
michael@0 42 overflow, and double it anyway -- C integer arithmetic ignores
michael@0 43 overflow, so the two digits we get back should still be valid, modulo
michael@0 44 the overflow.
michael@0 45
michael@0 46 Having doubled this value, we now have to add in the remainders and
michael@0 47 the digits already computed by earlier steps. If we did not overflow
michael@0 48 in the previous step, we might still cause an overflow here. That
michael@0 49 will happen whenever the maximum value expressible in two digits, less
michael@0 50 the amount we have to add, is greater than the result of the previous
michael@0 51 step. Thus, the overflow computation is:
michael@0 52
michael@0 53
michael@0 54 u = 0
michael@0 55 w = a[i] * a[j]
michael@0 56
michael@0 57 if(w > (R - 1)/ 2)
michael@0 58 u = 1;
michael@0 59
michael@0 60 w = w * 2
michael@0 61 v = c[i + j] + k
michael@0 62
michael@0 63 if(u == 0 && (R - 1 - v) < w)
michael@0 64 u = 1
michael@0 65
michael@0 66 If there is an overflow, u will be 1, otherwise u will be 0. The rest
michael@0 67 of the parameters are the same as they are in the above description.
michael@0 68
michael@0 69 ------------------------------------------------------------------
michael@0 70 This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
michael@0 71 # License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this
michael@0 72 # file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/.

mercurial